Jesse Lingard

[Psychobilly freakout]

you think tex would only set you back 2.5M?

Lingard...

 

[coagulantwolf]

I don't think he's the missing piece of the jigsaw though. People have been wanting us to play 4-4-2, and he's not an out and out winger of that formation. He's much better suited just behind the striker in the 4-2-3-1 or on the wing in that formation personally. Good player, just not what we need.

 

[Doc Lynam]

Good point. I'd agree that we need a proper chalk on boots type.

That is an argument i would understand.

 

[Machiavelli]

Beat me to it! I think this young man still learning his trade will develop into a real quality player. If he leaves MU his next choice could be crucial in his development. Would be very happy to see him sign for us at the right price.

Ah, but you beat me with the 'I hate the Daily Mail' signature

 

[Grombleton]

Would welcome him, but 2.5m is too much. 1.5-1.75 perhaps but I think him being a Man Utd player adds more to his value.

Out of any other their surplus to requirements players, i'd want to get Nick Powell. Liked him from his Crewe days.

 

[sydney]

bristol city....another hurdle , be happy to walk away from them with 4 point this season.

 

[spence]

Very good signing. 2.5 million is nothing these days.

 

[Peteinblack]

Ah, but you beat me with the 'I hate the Daily Mail' signature

One of my t-shirts

 

[Marshy]

I'd pay that for him any day, will only improve and a good player

 

[Sheebo]

Could clearly see he had something special about him - As could Man Utd. Yes I think we're missing a trick and 2.5mil is very cheap - thought he'd be going for 6mil to a lower prem club or to Derby tbh...

Looked good in the U21s Euros...

 

[Horton's halftime iceberg]

I think he is a snip at that price, however we must have enquired, I expect Bristol City are paying him big wages, above our structure.

 

[Medwayseagull]

Some people don't seem they realise what attacking players go for. This price looks a bargain compared to the £3.5 million being reported by Sky for Lee Tomlin.

 

[albionite]

Some people don't seem they realise what attacking players go for. This price looks a bargain compared to the £3.5 million being reported by Sky for Lee Tomlin.

Someone is going to spend£3.5m on Tomlin? Wow talk about overpriced and wasting money.

 

[Machiavelli]

View attachment 67522

One of my t-shirts

There's a fair few of us that need to wear that

 

[Albumen]

Scenes.

 

[Bold Seagull]

Got to chuckle. What do us fans know*?






*I rated him for us.

 

[Triggaaar]

Got to chuckle. What do us fans know?

Speak for yourself

4 goals in 17 for us (including the playoffs).

He was ok, but nothing special. Would be a real "meh" signing for me, but at £2.5m quite an expensive meh.

Yeah but he was young and quite slight. He should become an excellent player, and get stronger. £2.5m is good IMO.

Not for me. Quick but no trick.

 

[Easy 10]

He didn't pull up any trees with us, but fair play, he has come on a bit since then.

 

[Beanstalk]

I know he wasn't the most popular but it's very hard to argue in hindsight that he was the best young loanee we got in. (bar Abdul Razak's single game against Ipswich)

 

[Is it PotG?]

Did OK when he was here.