darkwolf666
Well-known member
Well I don't start many threads, but can I just say to all the doubters - how much do we miss Sam Baldock?
Need Stephens back and Baldock - back to what we know works. Get that Kayal & Stephens midfield going again.
Ross McCormack would have done that job perfectly. Him and Murray up front would get us promoted. Shame we never gambled on him and he went to Forest Ffs !
Baldock presses the opposition all on his own, he's a poxy nuisance. Huddersfield had all the time in the world tonight as Murray and Hemed mooched about. Maybe even with Baldock and Stephens we would have still lost, but there's no way it would have been such a bumming.
Baldock presses the opposition all on his own, he's a poxy nuisance. Huddersfield had all the time in the world tonight as Murray and Hemed mooched about. Maybe even with Baldock and Stephens we would have still lost, but there's no way it would have been such a bumming.
Yeah, him and Stephens can't come back soon enough.
When Baldock plays, we win more. His industry is fantastic.
But tonight, we were bereft and Huddersfield were on awesome form.
Ross McCormack would have done that job perfectly. Him and Murray up front would get us promoted. Shame we never gambled on him and he went to Forest Ffs !
When Baldock plays, we win more. His industry is fantastic.
But tonight, we were bereft and Huddersfield were on awesome form.
Its quite simple. Because of Baldocks work rate and ability to get back, when he plays we are generally 442 when attacking and 451 when not.
Hemed and Murray are both of a similar mould, they're target men, number 9's and when they play together its generally 442 all evening as they cant get back quick enough the moment we lose the ball.
Both Hemed and Murray offer more of a goal threat, but no doubt the balance of this team needs Baldock (or someone who can play that role).