Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Has the Beach Boys music aged better than the Beatles?



Mellotron

I've asked for soup
Jul 2, 2008
31,962
Brighton
My hamster that died 40 years ago has aged better than those tinny, mouthy, boring and one dimensional scousers.

Love me do, my arse.

Probably the LEAST one dimensional band of all time.
 






brakespear

Doctor Worm
Feb 24, 2009
12,326
Sleeping on the roof
Much prefer the Beach Boys to The Beatles, personally, although both have obviously been huge influences on music that came after.
 


Fungus

Well-known member
NSC Patron
May 21, 2004
7,057
Truro


Fungus

Well-known member
NSC Patron
May 21, 2004
7,057
Truro
Is a very correct answer.

Love virtually everything The Beatles did (apart from Old Brown Shoe)

And my avatar and signature gives away my adoration of Pet Sounds

My sig gives away something too...
 








Jan 10, 2014
540
I really do hate this comparison stuff. I liked both of them and they've both aged just fine.




 




Surf's Up

Well-known member
Jul 17, 2011
10,221
Here
I really do hate this comparison stuff. I liked both of them and they've both aged just fine.





Totally agree with this. Both did some superb stuff, some average stuff and some crap. The best of the Beatles, for me, were The White Album, Abbey Road and Revolver. For the Beach Boys it was Smile, Surfs Up and Holland.
 


Jbanged

New member
Jan 16, 2013
1,209
Barcelona
Strangely dug out a beach boys album the other day to put in the car. Sounds great. Even better on a sunny day!!
 








Pevenseagull

Anti-greed coalition
Jul 20, 2003
19,828
"God Only Knows" is better than "I Want To Hold Your Hand"






which is an achievement
 


studio150

Well-known member
Jul 30, 2011
29,738
On the Border
For those that believe that the Beach Boys have aged better than the Beatles, it is probably down to the fact that the Beatles are played far more regularly than the Beach Boys, so their songs are more well known. Also the fact that bands like ELO and Oasis made a career out of playing songs which were heavily influenced by the Beatles. Which means that when you play a Beach Boys album it will sound fresher as the songs are not on heavy rotation on Radio 2 and elsewhere.

Personally much prefer the Beatles, and currently enjoying listening to their early albums again while reading 'All these years volume one tune in' by Mark Lewisohn.
 






Mowgli37

Enigmatic Asthmatic
Jan 13, 2013
6,371
Sheffield
The Beatles suffer from having their early stuff being on heavy, HEAVY rotation. Songs like She Loves You, I Want to Hold your Hand and All my Loving are good tunes but very 'radio safe', nothing too adventurous and could really be any 60s pop group to the unknowing listener. As a result loads of people have built this negative boy-band image of them despite being unaware of their later (and mostly genius) output.

Take 'Tomorrow Never Knows', a frankly, incredible track, so ahead of it's time and yet how many average mainstream radio listeners would name it as a Beatles song, or even have heard it before? I've certainly never heard it being played (bar the excellent 6 Music). The vast plethora of styles, genres and instruments contained in the Beatles catalogue means that once you look beyond the dozen or so tracks that everyone has heard a million times, there's something for everyone, I can't say I've ever met anyone who despises each and every track they made.

I'm ashamed to say it, but I really haven't heard all that much Beach Boys music to compare them to the Beatles in terms of how they've aged. Judging by some of the thread replies though, I'd imagine they're in a similar situation, lots of hidden gems and a number of heavily played hits.
 


Lady Whistledown

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 7, 2003
47,272
For those that believe that the Beach Boys have aged better than the Beatles, it is probably down to the fact that the Beatles are played far more regularly than the Beach Boys, so their songs are more well known.

I wouldn't say that's the case, certainly not in a modern context. Isn't there some issue with the rights to the Beatles' songs, which basically means that radio stations (I'm thinking of the BBC here but it may apply elsewhere) don't play them? Whereas it's not hugely uncommon to hear Good Vibrations, say, or God Only Knows. I never, ever hear the Beatles on the radio (but it's not a Sixties thing as I do hear the Who, the Stones and so on).

I may be lining myself up for some stick here- but is Paul McCartney actually a particularly good singer? Or is my memory being tainted by wobbly recent stuff from him?
 


Jam The Man

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
8,145
South East North Lancing
I may be lining myself up for some stick here- but is Paul McCartney actually a particularly good singer? Or is my memory being tainted by wobbly recent stuff from him?

I think it's fair to say that his voice has deteriorated dramatically in the last decade. Probably down to age. I would however also say that Weller has a shocking voice now and I know I'll get panned for saying it!

Has McCartney ever had a good voice?
I'd suggest (imo) that he always had a good enough voice. I think The Beatles were a sum of four parts that were good enough for what they needed to be and luckily the completeness made them extraordinary.
I think he was probably the best singer in the band, but the OTT pro-Lennon brigade won't agree. They often want to conveniently believe it was Lennon's band alone, which it never was.
 




Super Steve Earle

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2009
8,441
North of Brighton
Help, Penny Lane, Money, I saw her Standing there, You really got a Hold on Me, Michelle, Norwegian Wood, Day Tripper, Paperback Writer, Eleanor Rigby. Can't think of anything much by the Beach Boys, but these are Beatles c
lassics I never tire of.
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here