Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

East Stand Ejections Today



GoldWithFalmer

Seaweed! Seaweed!
Apr 24, 2011
12,687
SouthCoast




I just find this petty and superior inter-stand point scoring pointless and pathetic.

Sorry if anyone finds that view dull.
Not dull, just a misreading of Beach Hut's original post.

Has anyone yet answered the question: There appeared to be one or two people escorted out the ground in the the first half over in the East Stand so what did they do?
 


Beach Hut

Brighton Bhuna Boy
Jul 5, 2003
72,057
Living In a Box
Not dull, just a misreading of Beach Hut's original post.

Oh hail the Lord, I hate his politics and he hates mine but the moderating voice of reason has finally arrived, you can polish the shoes of ERNEST now
 


e77

Well-known member
May 23, 2004
7,268
Worthing
100 per cent agree and now he is trying to squirm out.......like e77 before him,being a mod is making hans kray a menace on this site

As you seem to think I have previously tried to backtrack out of an opinion allow me to clarify my view: In my opinion you are a complete and utter waste of space who offers nothing to NSC and the place would be infinitely better if you crawled permanently back into whatever grubby little hole you call home and never came back.
 








GoldWithFalmer

Seaweed! Seaweed!
Apr 24, 2011
12,687
SouthCoast
Ernest was wearing TRAINERS today. How the hell can I POLISH trainers?

if they were the white canvass type,you can get white paint stuff for them,not sure it would help in this case thou
 


Not dull, just a misreading of Beach Hut's original post.

Nah. I think most people read it correctly. It was just a cheap shot at the East stand who, for various reasons will never be as vocal as the West and North. If that sort of thing warrants a piss-take of other fans then Beach Hut should be big enough to take the shots back at him not start bleating on about 'bullying' mods ffs.

And I question anyone claiming the moral high ground when you have the perma-angry fools like Vulture backing you up.
 




Beach Hut

Brighton Bhuna Boy
Jul 5, 2003
72,057
Living In a Box
Nah. I think most people read it correctly. It was just a cheap shot at the East stand who, for various reasons will never be as vocal as the West and North. If that sort of thing warrants a piss-take of other fans then Beach Hut should be big enough to take the shots back at him not start bleating on about 'bullying' mods ffs.

And I question anyone claiming the moral high ground when you have the perma-angry fools like Vulture backing you up.

You really are a CAUC all the time, well done
 


GoldWithFalmer

Seaweed! Seaweed!
Apr 24, 2011
12,687
SouthCoast
Nah. I think most people read it correctly. It was just a cheap shot at the East stand who, for various reasons will never be as vocal as the West and North. If that sort of thing warrants a piss-take of other fans then Beach Hut should be big enough to take the shots back at him not start bleating on about 'bullying' mods ffs.

And I question anyone claiming the moral high ground when you have the perma-angry fools like Vulture backing you up.

Personally i saw it this way-genuine question and a cheeky swipe-big deal!!
Can't be bothered to post new material so have copied my answer here from another thread to the way things turned out
________________________________________________
all i can view it as is a high scoring draw,5-5 great for the fans,managers and officials alike prefer not to see such matches....a few dodgy decisions along the way,much passion and desire shown by players and fans alike,the FA will look into it and charge both parties,but i see no real reason to let 1 bad night in the office spoil what has been a match that will live in the memory....

Tomorrows headlines

will read

NOT GOOD ENOUGH & THEY CANNOT AFFORD TO PLAY LIKE THAT AGAIN

&

STORM IN A TEA CUP

I expect all to be as you were in the morning.
 






terryberry1

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2011
5,023
Patcham
Nah. I think most people read it correctly. It was just a cheap shot at the East stand who, for various reasons will never be as vocal as the West and North. If that sort of thing warrants a piss-take of other fans then Beach Hut should be big enough to take the shots back at him not start bleating on about 'bullying' mods ffs.

And I question anyone claiming the moral high ground when you have the perma-angry fools like Vulture backing you up.

You are getting over excited now
 


GoldWithFalmer

Seaweed! Seaweed!
Apr 24, 2011
12,687
SouthCoast






Nah. I think most people read it correctly. It was just a cheap shot at the East stand who, for various reasons will never be as vocal as the West and North. If that sort of thing warrants a piss-take of other fans then Beach Hut should be big enough to take the shots back at him not start bleating on about 'bullying' mods ffs.

And I question anyone claiming the moral high ground when you have the perma-angry fools like Vulture backing you up.
That's an odd reading of the original post.

If anyone genuinely thought Beach Hut was taking the piss out of fellow supporters, he's taken the opportunity on several occasions to say that he wasn't. There seem to be people here who don't want to take a simple explanation at face value. They are belittling themselves.

By all means use NSC to hurl a bit of abuse about. But don't persist with this to the point at which you're not prepared to listen to reasoned argument.
 


GoldWithFalmer

Seaweed! Seaweed!
Apr 24, 2011
12,687
SouthCoast
That's an odd reading of the original post.

If anyone genuinely thought Beach Hut was taking the piss out of fellow supporters, he's taken the opportunity on several occasions to say that he wasn't. There seem to be people here who don't want to take a simple explanation at face value. They are belittling themselves.

By all means use NSC to hurl a bit of abuse about. But don't persist with this to the point at which you're not prepared to listen to reasoned argument.

He could of left the end(staying awake) bit off-however it could be read that BH was implying how on earth did anybody stay awake through that shambles?
 


That's an odd reading of the original post

It may be many things but my reading of it is far from odd considering the number of other people who took the same view and posted as such. And as for your later comment, sorry but (like many people) I read his first post at face value as a cheap shot and further posts (also at face value) as backtracking. I haven't hurled abuse and just because I don't agree with his argument doesn't mean I haven't listened.
 


GoldWithFalmer

Seaweed! Seaweed!
Apr 24, 2011
12,687
SouthCoast
It may be many things but my reading of it is far from odd considering the number of other people who took the same view and posted as such. And as for your later comment, sorry but (like many people) I read his first post at face value as a cheap shot and further posts (also at face value) as backtracking. I haven't hurled abuse and just because I don't agree with his argument doesn't mean I haven't listened.

Independently viewed-Post 14 will answer the question of validity of this view.
 






GoldWithFalmer

Seaweed! Seaweed!
Apr 24, 2011
12,687
SouthCoast
As I say. I think he backtracked. I can't see how the first post is anything other than a slightly amusing dig at the East Stand. If you read it differently then fair play but I can't be arsed losing my rag one way or the other over a throwaway remark on an internet forum.

i read it as you did-post 190 will conclude matters and is i think the best answer,the true answer,and the answer that will happen,imo....been fun
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here