Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Did we Land On The Moon ? 8pm channel 5
- Thread starter T soprano
- Start date
it is early in the morning here, that is my only excuse (aside from being an argumentative tit). I thought I did quite a good job of wriggling off your hook but I was too slow.
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
You may manage to keep thousands of NASA workers quiet but how do you keep the Aussie's quiet? They monitored the radio transmissions. Scientists also know the moon is slowly moving away from the earth from measurements taken each year from equipment left there by the astronauts.
BadFish
Huge Member
- Oct 19, 2003
- 17,247
Sergei's Celebration
Well-known member
Nope, i am not a member of NASA, a space enthusiast, a Russian spy, was present at any rocket launch nor testing the kilos of rock samples that came back. I haven't seen any evidence to say they didn't go either.
Psychobilly freakout
HellBilly
No there is a case for example the photos and shadows from the lights, and to be honest the bloody spokes person on behalf of Nasa was terrible by simpling replying something like there are too many theories therefore we wont answer them..... eeerrrr do answer them and that will be that.
Its not a life or death matter, just a tv show because nothing else was on as usual and I only wanted to see the bloody perfume adds and the add about the over sized watch !!
Leekbrookgull
Well-known member
A mixture of new and old in the programme,so if we look at the science angle how relevent is the radiation point and to be fair yes everytime you have any sort of x-ray the staff stand behind a shield or leave the room and is that not low level radiation ?
SeagullSongs
And it's all gone quiet..
Can you explain what you mean by this, please?
Sergei's Celebration
Well-known member
I must say actually one of my points above it incorrect.
My name is Sergei Tretyakov a russian spy.
My name is Sergei Tretyakov a russian spy.
T soprano
New member
- Thread starter
- #69
Keeping the Aussies quiet don't think badfish is capable Of that
I remember seeing a film about the satellite transmission relayed around the world from australlia for the moon landing good film forgot the title of it
Just remembered I think it was called contact
BadFish
Huge Member
- Oct 19, 2003
- 17,247
BadFish
Huge Member
- Oct 19, 2003
- 17,247
Convict then
I see my role more as a prison guard drafted in to led the colonials out of the dark ages of the 80's (seriously the 80 lasted for about 15 years down here, then it went away for a bit and now it is back).
Sergei's Celebration
Well-known member
Wasnt contact the one with Jodie foster based on the Carl Sagan novel i think your thinking of the dish.
Psychobilly freakout
HellBilly
They showed photos taken on the moon taken by cameras attached to the suits about chest height that they could not control as the cameras were kinda glued or something to the actual suit. These photos taken were perfect which was unlikely apart from that with only the Sun as a source of light the shadows cast from different objects/craft and people fell in different directions which is not possible from one light source according to the experts. The Nasa experts reply to this was there were too many criticisms for him to explain them.... That is what the show said not what I believe or take as gospel, just made me think as an open minded person aaaahhh maybe.
They ultimately implied that other lights were used other than the Sun.
Last edited:
deletebeepbeepbeep
Well-known member
- May 12, 2009
- 21,169
People need to stop smoking too much weed and watching videos on youtube IMO.
SeagullSongs
And it's all gone quiet..
beorhthelm
A. Virgo, Football Genius
- Jul 21, 2003
- 35,477
yeah, because when Scorsese filmed it in the studio, he didnt think to check the number of light sources. then having seen the footage, no one corrected it. or, could there be an explaination...? see mythbusters. thats the funny thing about this and most conspiracies, they require more suspension of disbelieve than the advocates claim you need to believe the "official" version of events.
or put another way...
[yt]mo_nltYf9gw[/yt]
Herne Hill Seagull
Well-known member
They then went on to fake another five manned missions, entirely pointlessly, making exactly the same mistakes every single time.
I don't understand human nature sometimes. It feels like every time there's some huge, world-grabbing event, some people fall over each other trying to convince everybody it never happened. When we eventually walk on Mars, no doubt there will be the same shit.
In the space of 60 years how did we invent the first plane to fly to landing on the moon
Yes, but the Sunday Sport reported that a Lancaster Bomber was found on the moon - so that's obviously the missing link between the two events. They also reported later that it had disappeared - thus proving the existence of moon-dwellers. I don't understand what all the fuss is about.