PaoloRossiJohnson
Member
...scores with a penalty v. Plymouth
Trigger said:Can't believe DK didn't hold out for a million...
I think that's being wise after the event. Why didn't they (or anybody else) pick him up on a free transfer from Wycombe in the first place if he was obviously so good?Brixtaan said:Right now who cares but today's win for Ipswich is worth £250,000 alone.What a crime he went for that.
Why the hell didn't DK arrange a bonus for us if they go up? similar to DC.
Brovian said:I think that's being wise after the event. Why didn't they (or anybody else) pick him up on a free transfer from Wycombe in the first place if he was obviously so good?
Tooting Gull said:It is a hell of a story. Player gets to 30, playing exclusively in the bottom two leagues, gets about 15 games in the Championship and then a move that puts him within touching distance of the Premiership, playing the best football of his life. Good luck to him.
I still think it's being wise after the event. Did anybody really expect Currie to be Ipswich's best player? (Bit of poetic licence I know as I don't know how good he is in comparison to the other players, but still). Perhaps during the negotiations Ipswich said '£200k now and another £50k' if we get promoted and we said 'No, we want it all now'. (£200k still being a good price for a Wycombe reject only on a one year contract).Brixtaan said:Your usual admirable reasoning doesn't explain why we won't be getting a bonus if he helps them to a £20million promotion bonanza
Eh? The argument was whether we should have had a bonus clause, not how much it was worth. You said it was 'a crime' that we didn't have one, whereas I think it just would have been the icing on what was still a very good deal.Brixtaan said:50k bonus for a £30 million payday? (thanks for the revised figure ac gull.Just clinched the argument i think)
Brovian said:Actually Brixtaan the thing we really should have had was a sell-on clause. 50-100k bonus will be chicken feed when Ipswich sell him to Chelsea for £6m.