I can't help but wonder why they wanted to demolish that building in the first place? Surely doing the twin towers have them all the Leverage they needed?
Our maybe too sate their craving for attention, that makes people do weird things.
Of the days events, must've been on some computers or notepad, easier to get rid of it all in one go plus sell the plot to a millionaire
Anything specific? Surely most stuff could have been kept in the twin towers and got rid of in the original demolitions?
No it wasn't. They had a list of every passenger on the flight (or if I go along with your theory for a second, they could say they did) and having a passport to show is nothing different to saying the person's name was on the flight list. The passport could have been an innocent passengers instead of one of the terrorists, so again, having a passport proves nothing, so there'd be no point in doing it.
It was completely different.
Why would the top cave in first on a controlled demolition when they explosive are are the bottom? I've shown you videos of real controlled demolitions, and they're different. And they come with the sound of explosives being used, unlike any of the buildings at the WTC.
People didn't know. One person or so reported that it had come down, when it hadn't. That person would have been unaware of what the building was made from, or the history of steel buildings etc. It was simply a reporting error, as reports would have come in the it had been burning for hours and it was to all intense and purpose destroyed (destroyed on the inside and un-repairable).
It's not an excuse, it's reality. It had what amounted to a constant supply of fuel that kept feeding the fire, while most firefighters were dealing with the twin towers. You don't get many old steel buildings like that burning for so long, which is why there aren't more similar disasters.
