*Gullsworth*
My Hair is like his hair
Wilkins.............The Contract........How long should it have been..........you decide!!
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
0...1,2 or 3? How many years SHOULD it have been?
- Thread starter *Gullsworth*
- Start date
jonny.rainbow
Well-known member
- Oct 29, 2005
- 6,614
It all depends on the finer details of the contract.
He may not be on a lot and there may be a clause that means he won't get full payment of the 3 years if sacked because we got relegated.
He may not be on a lot and there may be a clause that means he won't get full payment of the 3 years if sacked because we got relegated.
crodonilson
He/Him
He had the rest of this season to prove himself and it looks like we are going to narrowly beat relegation which isn't that great is it??
Ok we've shown some encouraging signs at times but particularly with our home form we've gone backwards in other areas. I think on the strangth of it a 3 year deal is a huge gamble.
Ok we've shown some encouraging signs at times but particularly with our home form we've gone backwards in other areas. I think on the strangth of it a 3 year deal is a huge gamble.
*Gullsworth*
My Hair is like his hair
- Thread starter
- #4
Yes....three years is a huge gamble..................afraid its one for me!
Monkster
Ragamuffin
Rolling One Year innit
British Bulldog
The great escape
- Feb 6, 2006
- 10,897
I'm more than happy with the 3 year contract, It's looking more than likely that until we get Falmer the bulk of our squad will be from the youth team so who better to manage them?
Scotty Mac
New member
- Jul 13, 2003
- 24,405
as was said, he was given this season to prove himself - if anything, i would say we have gone backwards
it should of been a year - that gives him the summer to get his own men in, and then should we need to dispense with him at any point next season we wont need to pay up a ridiculous amount of compensation
it should of been a year - that gives him the summer to get his own men in, and then should we need to dispense with him at any point next season we wont need to pay up a ridiculous amount of compensation
Two years with an option of third.
I dont expect much next year, however the year after is the one.
I dont expect much next year, however the year after is the one.
Ding Dong !
Boy I'm HOT today !
So if we start the season losing 11 on the bounce ( like 2/3 years ago ) will the Directors keep faith with him or will he to be ousted ?
Rookie
Greetings
- Feb 8, 2005
- 12,083
Personally would have gone for 2 years and a extension. Having said that can see what the board are trying to do by tying him down for that long. If he is a success and other clubs come sniffing around we will get compo but if it is not a success then i doubt he is on that much money and so sacking would not cost that much.
Think the first one is a more viable idea, clubs took note of what he did with the youth team
Think the first one is a more viable idea, clubs took note of what he did with the youth team
Ernest
Stupid IDIOT
Ding Dong ! said:
And that is more than likely given the run of form we have had and this clown shows no signs of being able to turn it round
D
Deleted member 2719
Guest
British Bulldog said:
I also feel DK is trying to say this is what we can afford and Wilkins is the best man and for that reason he get's the 3years so all you winging F*ckers
and get behind him.Da Man Clay
T'Blades
- Dec 16, 2004
- 16,256
2 years. I dont expect him to last through next year though if things keep going as they are at the moment.
supaseagull
Well-known member
The reason why 3 years has been offered is because Knight rates Wilkins so highly that in the event of another club coming in for him, they'd have to pay us a considerable sum of money, like Reading and Leicester did with Coppell and Adams respectively.
I think it's quite a clever ploy providing we don't absolutely f*** up next year
I think it's quite a clever ploy providing we don't absolutely f*** up next year
*Gullsworth*
My Hair is like his hair
- Thread starter
- #16
Mouldy Boots said:
I also feel DK is trying to say this is what we can afford and McGee is the best man and for that reason he get's the 3years so all you winging F*ckers
Surely not...............
Rangdo
Registered Cider Drinker
I will make my decision after his first full year at which point I will come on here and scream and shout that I was right all along. I'm so clever 
