That's not quite true. It's unlikely he left her asleep in her own piss. She probably wet the bed later in the night. If the girl asked him to have sex with her in front of his mate, I'm not going to judge him further just because his mate watched.
I don't think there was any video footage of the incident. The only reason they know Ched had sex with her is because he (and his friend) said so.
It’s a bit like the burglar claiming innocence because the window was open and he was only following his mate inside anyway. I mean surely the owner of the property must have given him permission to enter by leaving the window open in the first place.
The intention of whom? Not the accused.
That's not relevant to whether it was videoed, which is what we were discussing. But I wouldn't suggest it was a good idea to admit it, given that he then went to jail. He could have just said 'my lawyer has advised me not to talk to comment' and waited for a charge to be brought.
No one said it did.
Yes it does. In Ched's case it would probably have been better than saying 'I had sex with her'.
You're saying that it was clearly a sex prank - that much is not clear at all.
That doesn't mean he raped her. She probably knew before Ched did that she went there for sex.
Oh so it's supposed to be a message then, rather than justice.
So even if he's not guilty of rape, you will think of him as a rapist, despite the fact that you know nothing about the girl or what she may or may not have wanted. I think that's crazy.
Did you miss the bit where he said IF he is acquitted?
No. However, if his conviction is quashed then he's no longer a convicted rapist.
He's too poor a player for what we need up front, now we are top of the league.
