Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Parliamentary Labour Party imploding



Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
I was a royalist before but after this fiasco, I'm totally not. Seriously. The idea that an unelected figurehead with no real power or use can say to an elected MP (**** or not) 'you will kneel before me so help you God.' is completely outrageous as:

A: Church & State should always be separate. Obviously.
B: You can't go threatening people, not least with the wrath of an entity that probably doesn't exist.

Where is the evidence, apart from two right wing newspapers, that this has actually happened?
 




Hastings gull

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2013
4,635
Typical politicians, they give people a vote, they don't like the result so throw their toys out of the pram, rebel and refuse to accept the people's democratic decision because they know better. Nothing really new here.

But of course it is not that simple, is it ?
Yes, you are right in that there was a vote and JC won fair and square -no problem, if you don't look at the bigger picture. The problem for the Labour party, as it was in the 80s, is that those who voted for JC are not necessarily representative of the traditional Labour support. The activists tend to be left wing and as they are those who attend all meetings etc, and shout the loudest, they tend to dominate various committees/local organisations etc, and thus convince themselves that they are the majority voice. More moderate Labour MPs are fully aware of this and know that the electorate at large has hitherto shown little appetite for the type of socialism advocated by the current crop in apparent charge, hence their reluctance to embrace the Corbynistas.
 


wellquickwoody

Many More Voting Years
NSC Patron
Aug 10, 2007
13,624
Melbourne
This'll be the same Labour party that are now the largest party in the UK and have seen an absolutely METEORIC upswing in popularity over the past few months? OK then.

I love you guys, I really do, you keep believing your own RHEOTORIC! :thumbsup:
 


wellquickwoody

Many More Voting Years
NSC Patron
Aug 10, 2007
13,624
Melbourne
The activists tend to be left wing and as they are those who attend all meetings etc, and shout the loudest, they tend to dominate various committees/local organisations etc, and thus convince themselves that they are the majority voice

Trades Union and Socialist Coalition (TUSC twxts) are no doubt all re-enrolled back in the Labour Party right now, displaying their vitriol and bile of anyone with ambition to better themselves rather than sit on their arse.

In Hove the Labour party have a new MP, Peter Kyle, who appears to be a genuine contender for leader in the not too distant future. I am sure he is sitting and biding his time until this lot screw up and present an opportunity to the sensible side of the party to get back to the politics of the masses. Peter Kyle for PM in 2025 anyone?
 


beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
35,332
Where is the evidence, apart from two right wing newspapers, that this has actually happened?

i'm confused by this: what do you think hasn't happened?
 




Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
i'm confused by this: what do you think hasn't happened?

The Mail & Telegraph were reporting that Corbyn is to be stripped of his Right Honourable title because he hasn't attended a Privy Council meeting yet, or won't bow his knee to the Queen.
There's another thread on it, which was debated yesterday.

Corbyn hasn't said that he won't kneel before the Queen, and the reason he hasn't attended a Privy Council meeting yet, is because he was on holiday. I Googled it yesterday and the only references to the Queen and her officers were in the Mail & Telegraph, whereas the only other reference was Nsc and a news source which stated the above ie. he hasn't had the title yet, let alone be stripped of it.

http://www.northstandchat.com/showt...The-Privy-Council-and-national-security/page3
 


beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
35,332
yep, and there i refuted the claim that matter is only being reported by two newspapers. there's evidence of the parliament website before and after "Rt Hon" being removed. he hasn't taken or arranged is oath to the Privy Council, so isnt currently eligible for the title. its widely reported his spokemans saying he had an prior appointment, and then that he was on holibobs in Scotland. so its pretty clear that it has really happened. the only question open is whether he will take the oath in presence of Queen or in absence.
 


Gwylan

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
31,360
Uffern
Trades Union and Socialist Coalition (TUSC twxts) are no doubt all re-enrolled back in the Labour Party right now, displaying their vitriol and bile of anyone with ambition to better themselves rather than sit on their arse.


As has been pointed out on here several times, TUSC supporters (in effect Socialist Party members) have not been encouraged to join the Labour Party or vote for Corbyn. There were probably more Tory party members than Socialist Party supporters who voted for JC :)
 






Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
yep, and there i refuted the claim that matter is only being reported by two newspapers. there's evidence of the parliament website before and after "Rt Hon" being removed. he hasn't taken or arranged is oath to the Privy Council, so isnt currently eligible for the title. its widely reported his spokemans saying he had an prior appointment, and then that he was on holibobs in Scotland. so its pretty clear that it has really happened. the only question open is whether he will take the oath in presence of Queen or in absence.

Which was what I was trying to tell Pandapops who is all ready to revile the Queen for interfering in politics.
 


JC Footy Genius

Bringer of TRUTH
Jun 9, 2015
10,568
John McDonnell Shadow Chancellor September 26th - Labour will back a charter requiring the government to deliver an overall surplus by 2019-20.

"We accept we are going to have to live within our means and we always will do - full stop." He continued: "We will support the charter. We will support the charter on the basis we are going to want to balance the book, we do want to live within our means and we will tackle the deficit."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34366569

October 13th - Mr McDonnell said he had changed his mind on parliamentary tactics but denied changing his economic policy. He said they had seen the bill as a "gimmick" so had intended to "ridicule it" by voting for it.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34519164

Honesty, principles, no more spin, a new dawn of open democratic debate ........
 




Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat


alfredmizen

Banned
Mar 11, 2015
6,342
John McDonnell Shadow Chancellor September 26th - Labour will back a charter requiring the government to deliver an overall surplus by 2019-20.

"We accept we are going to have to live within our means and we always will do - full stop." He continued: "We will support the charter. We will support the charter on the basis we are going to want to balance the book, we do want to live within our means and we will tackle the deficit."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34366569

October 13th - Mr McDonnell said he had changed his mind on parliamentary tactics but denied changing his economic policy. He said they had seen the bill as a "gimmick" so had intended to "ridicule it" by voting for it.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34519164

Honesty, principles, no more spin, a new dawn of open democratic debate ........
:lolol:They are painfully deluded and naive.
 






JC Footy Genius

Bringer of TRUTH
Jun 9, 2015
10,568
:lolol:They are painfully deluded and naive.

Indeed. Labour are on the brink of political oblivion if this goes on much longer.

I think the saner elements of the PLP have to try and persuade Corybn to stand down asap for the good of the party and more importantly the country.
 


Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
59,747
The Fatherland
Indeed. Labour are on the brink of political oblivion if this goes on much longer.

I think the saner elements of the PLP have to try and persuade Corybn to stand down asap for the good of the party and more importantly the country.

Drama queen
 


Gwylan

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
31,360
Uffern
Indeed. Labour are on the brink of political oblivion if this goes on much longer.

:lolol::lolol::lolol::lolol::lolol:

Yep, the party with the fastest growing membership is on the brink of oblivion.

And for those who say, look at the wider electorate, the latest opinion poll (out yesterday) has Labour cutting Tories' lead

Mike Gapes faced a deselection challenge about 12 years ago when he voted for the war in Iraq - he's a prime candidate for the boot. He and John Mann must be on thin ice
 






Bold Seagull

strong and stable with me, or...
Mar 18, 2010
29,834
Hove
Meanwhile....somewhere in Downing St. our PM does a u-turn on it's Saudi prison deal....perhaps they might consider not bribing them to purchase our weapons next....or not....

maybe just support them on the UN Human Rights Council instead....
 


Gwylan

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
31,360
Uffern
Meanwhile....somewhere in Downing St. our PM does a u-turn on it's Saudi prison deal....perhaps they might consider not bribing them to purchase our weapons next....or not....

Funnily enough, the Mail and the Telegraph aren't reporting the "shambles" of this u-turn. It's way, way down the page on the Mail home page
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here