pastafarian
Well-known member
they didnt
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
conspiracy theory doubters.
- Thread starter brighton fella
- Start date
they didnt
brighton fella
New member
- Mar 20, 2009
- 1,645
- Thread starter
- #242
you are right I cant be absolutely sure that she wasn't lying in exactly the same way that you cant be absolutely sure she wasn't telling the truth.
if by chance she is lying what exactly does she get out of it ...or anyone come to that
fair enough some might lie on the expense of selling a book. but even then you cant dismiss their story just for writing a book..because some things need to be published. a nobody like me cant just create concrete evidence out of thin air,.it takes someone of high importance and even he cant really .
there are untold amounts of videos.exposing all this kind of stuff, if you can give me some concrete evidence yourself claiming that each and every one of these videos are 100% false & fake i'll raise my hat to you.. .
beorhthelm
A. Virgo, Football Genius
- Jul 21, 2003
- 35,315
dont be so silly, other previously unknown scandals have come to light, therefore all those speculated about must therefore be true.
seriously though, there isnt. theres untold amounts of videos *claiming* this and that is exposed. without evidence, dubious witness, reference to other similar videos or plain contradictions.
brighton fella
New member
- Mar 20, 2009
- 1,645
- Thread starter
- #244
oh my good f*cking god. what have I just been saying dumbo. ? why bother if no one can be arsed to watch, you've dismissed it before ever f*cking seeing it you goon.
daveinprague
New member
Because its THREE HOURS long.
symyjym
Banned
Some conspiracies theories are plausible, however any CTer that includes 911 in their mantra damages their own credibility. The trouble with the diehard CTer is that they are unable to dismiss fantasy using a rational thought process, and for all intent and purposes never cast a shadow of doubt on any part of an elaborate sequence of events.
With the WTC a CTer will always insist the explosives were set off in the basement, but it is clear from all the videos, that the buildings collapsed at the point of the plane impacts. My rule is to test a CTer on the WTC and if they fail, I know that they are easily (self) brainwashed and will believe anything.
pastafarian
Well-known member
are you aware of how many people have watched that 3 hour video
daveinprague
New member
Brighton Fella, post some 'truth' thats maybe 2hrs 55ms shorter, and people may...may...watch it. Im sure its not the only example of the 'truth' ....shirly?
Hillian1
( . ) ( . )
pastafarian
Well-known member
- Jul 10, 2003
- 25,876
If you take your open mind and read a bit of recent history, you will find that certain areas of the media were all over this in the 1980s. At that time CT's tended to be limited to mid west rednecks who had been probed by aliens.
Having read that back, CTs haven't really changed much have they,
Oh well, carry on regardless
Megazone
On his last warning
I do understand what you are saying but we must understand the amount of misinformation out there both ways.
You say the 9/11 conspiracy is dis-credible.
What do you make of this BBC documentary? It's where a CT called Charlie Veitch did a bbc documnetary which was supposed to be about 9/11 being an inside job, but bizarrely he suddenly changed his mind based on official evidence given to him. This is just a 3 mins take from it.
Do you take his word? let me know what you think.
Last edited:
Megazone
On his last warning
This is the same guy (Charlie Veitch) as a witness for Ian tomlinson death
This is what actually happened:
So the 9/11 official version was supported by a professional bullshitter on a BBC documentary?
This man will obviously lie to the lowest levels and that's what he's paid to do. Is it not questionable why he was employed to do the BBC documentary on 9/11 if there wasn't anything to hide?
This is what actually happened:
So the 9/11 official version was supported by a professional bullshitter on a BBC documentary?
This man will obviously lie to the lowest levels and that's what he's paid to do. Is it not questionable why he was employed to do the BBC documentary on 9/11 if there wasn't anything to hide?
daveinprague
New member
...and the BBC would hide something that happened in the USA? Why?
Megazone
On his last warning
They aren't exactly enemies.
So what do you make of the 3 videos above?
Can you see why people struggle to believe the 'offiical version' of 9/11 when things like the 3 videos above happen?
Would yo trust that man? I certainly wouldn't.
The Wizard
Well-known member
- Jul 2, 2009
- 18,383
Why does anybody even waste their time replying? Quite simply, conspiracy loonies will never change their minds even in the face of undeniable facts so whats the point even attempting to reason.
daveinprague
New member
Er, my question was, why would the BBC feel obliged to hide anything, regarding an event in the USA? 'They arent exactly enemies' is a pretty ridiculous stance.
