Return of the Rev
Well-known member
He has been dragging nsc down for too long!
He has been dragging nsc down for too long!
i'm sure i have a photo of you with enrest from the early 80's.
He will be back saturday .
You would have all been very proud of me as the Prime Minister caught the same train as me to day on his way to Rochester.
Shows what a dimwit Cameron is. You were going to Margit. I will probably be banned for putting down the Tories by Bozzas militia: Heavy Hands Kray, Goldstone Raper , High Tony and other fighters refusing freedom of speech on a football fan's forum.
By football fan I mean Lord Bozza, of course.
Shows what a dimwit Cameron is. You were going to Margit. I will probably be banned for putting down the Tories by Bozzas militia: Heavy Hands Kray, Goldstone Raper , High Tony and other fighters refusing freedom of speech on a football fan's forum.
By football fan I mean Lord Bozza, of course.
Shows what a dimwit Cameron is. You were going to Margit. I will probably be banned for putting down the Tories by Bozzas militia: Heavy Hands Kray, Goldstone Raper , High Tony and other fighters refusing freedom of speech on a football fan's forum.
By football fan I mean Lord Bozza, of course.
You'd do well to find an occasion where I've taken issue with someone for putting down the Tories...
No, hang on .... I think I know the answer .... I'd scream for a policeman and then threaten action in the Small Claims Court ?How would you feel if someone posted an allegation about you which was not true ?
I'll try to explain: the mods very rarely get involved where a post is "just" tasteless. The only time they seem to is if multiple people report it and where just about every post in a thread after the tasteless post which comments on it is negative. They might act then if they think that the community as a whole wants to see the poster reprimanded.
Mods do act unilaterally, inter alia, where the post contains illegality (eg racism), where it may result in libel action against the site &/or owner and where there is a significant chance that a post may upset Google enough to withdraw the great bulk of the site's revenue (principally swearing, or the overly clumsy avoidance of the filter, and photos which overly sexualise the subject).
Speaking personally, I would not have posted the image you refer to in a million years, and thought it inappropriate. But that's a personal opinion. Given that you were (and remain, three months later) the only poster to complain about it, and also given it wasn't illegal, didn't cross the boundaries of what we know will upset Google and didn't involve swearing, if I had done something about it, it would simply have been because of my personal sensibilities, which would, imo, have been inappropriate.
Thankyou for such a lengthy and clear explanation. I appreciate the time you have taken on this matter....and that it is done voluntarily.
I am also pleased that you are wholly in agreement that the posting of the photograph was disgusting...(moderator speak;..."inappropriate").
In conclusion from your reply I can quite clearly see, that collectively the Moderators do not appear to have an ethical moral code when judging reported posts, but are driven by the fear of money....(i.e. Lost revenue from google should the unthinkable happen and a pair of mammary glands are shown, or a potentially libel post on this universally known forum, read by billions).
Perhaps a reminder to posters as a 'Sticky'...message to posters...."when reporting a post , please remember we only care about money...not morals."
Perhaps a reminder to posters as a 'Sticky'...message to posters...."when reporting a post , please remember we only care about money...not morals."
In conclusion from your reply I can quite clearly see, that collectively the Moderators do not appear to have an ethical moral code when judging reported posts
but are driven by the fear of money....(i.e. Lost revenue from google should the unthinkable happen and a pair of mammary glands are shown, or a potentially libel post on this universally known forum, read by billions).
Perhaps a reminder to posters as a 'Sticky'...message to posters...."when reporting a post , please remember we only care about money...not morals."
Thankyou for such a lengthy and clear explanation. I appreciate the time you have taken on this matter....and that it is done voluntarily.
I am also pleased that you are wholly in agreement that the posting of the photograph was disgusting...(moderator speak;..."inappropriate").
In conclusion from your reply I can quite clearly see, that collectively the Moderators do not appear to have an ethical moral code when judging reported posts, but are driven by the fear of money....(i.e. Lost revenue from google should the unthinkable happen and a pair of mammary glands are shown, or a potentially libel post on this universally known forum, read by billions).
Perhaps a reminder to posters as a 'Sticky'...message to posters...."when reporting a post , please remember we only care about money...not morals."
PS - I'm not a Mod.
Are you a ROCKER?
Thankyou for such a lengthy and clear explanation. I appreciate the time you have taken on this matter....and that it is done voluntarily.
I am also pleased that you are wholly in agreement that the posting of the photograph was disgusting...(moderator speak;..."inappropriate").
In conclusion from your reply I can quite clearly see, that collectively the Moderators do not appear to have an ethical moral code when judging reported posts, but are driven by the fear of money....(i.e. Lost revenue from google should the unthinkable happen and a pair of mammary glands are shown, or a potentially libel post on this universally known forum, read by billions).
Perhaps a reminder to posters as a 'Sticky'...message to posters...."when reporting a post , please remember we only care about money...not morals."
Thankyou for such a lengthy and clear explanation. I appreciate the time you have taken on this matter....and that it is done voluntarily.
I am also pleased that you are wholly in agreement that the posting of the photograph was disgusting...(moderator speak;..."inappropriate").
In conclusion from your reply I can quite clearly see, that collectively the Moderators do not appear to have an ethical moral code when judging reported posts, but are driven by the fear of money....(i.e. Lost revenue from google should the unthinkable happen and a pair of mammary glands are shown, or a potentially libel post on this universally known forum, read by billions).
Perhaps a reminder to posters as a 'Sticky'...message to posters...."when reporting a post , please remember we only care about money...not morals."
I'm hurt by that, deeply, I care passionately about mammary glands.