Option C, kill them.
If they are in a war zone without justification then they are aiding an enemy power so should have been hung as traitors.
This particular case was found by the Americans as a prisoner of the Taliban after being captured on the Afghan/Iranian border and suspected of being a British spy! It's not as if he was even known to be in direct conflict with Western forces.
2 years of 'interrogation' revealed nothing.
I don't doubt that there were bad guys in Guantanamo but the OP's original mischief making here is fatuous in the extreme.
ah yes, I forgot that he was there on a "religious holiday" , obviously completely innocent , your gullibility or is it stupidity knows no bounds.Will you change the pissing record?
It's hardly surprising that a bloke who has been held without charge and most probably treated inhumanely has come out with a hatred and determination to fight against the West. He's not exactly going to come out all smiles and shaking hands in thanks is he?
ah yes, I forgot that he was there on a "religious holiday" , obviously completely innocent , your gullibility or is it stupidity knows no bounds.
i wouldnt have converted to islam and gone on a ''religious holiday'' to the pakistani/afghan border , religious holiday just how fvcking gullible are you ??Seems we had a few options with the Guantanamo prisoners. I'd like to know what was the best course of action.
A) charge them with an offence.
B) imprison them and torture them indefinitely
C) kill them.
D) release them under surveillance.
Assuming that a and c weren't open to us, what else were we supposed to do? Whether this particular case was or wasn't a bad man before his imprisonment without charge isn't even the issue here. After years of torture we still had nothing. It is no surprise he holds a grievance against the West.
The OP has a deep hatred of Jeremy Corbyn based on something he said so I'm not sure he's really in a position to judge this man's actions. I shudder to think what revenge he'd be after in this man's position.
Then he wasnt there for benign reasons then was he ?Where did I say he was innocent or on a religious holiday?
Then he wasnt there for benign reasons then was he ?
Then he wasnt there for benign reasons then was he ?
Then he wasnt there for benign reasons then was he ?