Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Register Log in

The Islamic Future of Britain



lawros left foot

lawros left foot

Glory hunting since 1969
Jun 11, 2011
13,742
Worthing
Soulman said:
What misrepresentation BF.
1400 groomed in Rotherham, grooming in Oxford, Derby, Bradford, Keighley, Odham etc, or the beheading of Drummer Rigby, the 85+ Sharia Courts, the poll showing over 30% of British Muslims want Sharia Law, the beheading of one or soon to be two British citizens, the killing of 7/7/2005......what misrepresentation do you mean?
Click to expand...

Funnily enough,all the child abuse carried carried out by Roman Catholic priests was by practicing Roman Catholics,and the persecution of Jews, was carried out by mainly Nazi sympathisers, during the 30s and 40s in Germany, but we dont cndemn all Germans or all Roman Catholics, there are bad people in every society, the trick is, don't let them win, and by condemning ALL moslems, the bad guys are akready half way there
 




S

Soulman

New member
Oct 22, 2012
10,966
Sompting
Worrying, or nothing to worry about?. From today's London Evening Standard.
"London children as young as ten being 'trained to be junior jihadis,' warns Deputy Mayor, as extent of extremist threat in the capital is revealed
Deputy Mayor Stephen Greenhalgh said that the way some children were being radicalised was “horrendous” as he revealed that both he and Boris Johnson have been briefed on cases in which primary pupils have been subjected to propaganda and “extremist ideology” by their families."
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/lond...unior-jihadis-warns-deputy-mayor-9728606.html
 


terryberry1

terryberry1

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2011
5,023
Patcham
Very worrying. Yet judging by some of the comments on this thread it will be seen as an over reaction by the newspaper :annoyed:
 


gregbrighton

gregbrighton

New member
Aug 10, 2014
2,059
Brighton
lawros left foot said:
Funnily enough,all the child abuse carried carried out by Roman Catholic priests was by practicing Roman Catholics,and the persecution of Jews, was carried out by mainly Nazi sympathisers, during the 30s and 40s in Germany, but we dont cndemn all Germans or all Roman Catholics, there are bad people in every society, the trick is, don't let them win, and by condemning ALL moslems, the bad guys are akready half way there
Click to expand...

Exactly. It doesn't stop the far-right racists on this board to politicising the muslim child abuse for their own sick agenda. Thousands of children have been abused by catholic clergy across the world.

It is time that religion, all religions should be stopping their adherents and leaders from sexually and physically abusing children in their care/trust.
 


wellquickwoody

wellquickwoody

Many More Voting Years
NSC Patron
Aug 10, 2007
13,625
Melbourne
Plooks said:
Does it really matter what the majority religion is in a country!? Personally I couldn't care less what the religion of the UK is.
Click to expand...
Change the word from religion to 'culture'. Do you still have a couldn't care less attitude?
 




pastafarian

pastafarian

Well-known member
Sep 4, 2011
11,902
Sussex
gregbrighton said:
Exactly. It doesn't stop the far-right racists on this board to politicising the muslim child abuse for their own sick agenda.
Click to expand...

crumbs!Nazi racist propagandists on NSC!

rather than a flippant remark any chance you can name and shame these people with evidence of their far right postings?
 


father_and_son

father_and_son

Well-known member
Jan 23, 2012
4,646
Under the Police Box
Dick Knights Mumm said:
I completely disagree. Everyone in the country should use the same legal processes as everyone else. There was an interesting programme about these courts a while back - and it was not always the two willing parties you wish to think.
Click to expand...

Why? Lots of people resolve disputes without going through the courts. Should everyone who has ever negotiated on a price, terminated a contract or disputed a will go to court even if they could come to an agreement without the court?

No one is getting the better of you! No one is getting away with a crime! No one is getting their hands chopped off! Two people who disagree over something have chosen this method of resolving the dispute.

Not everyone going through the conventional courts is doing so willingly! People are sued, divorced, bankrupted, etc and are generally very unhappy about it, but they then respect the decision of the court.

If either party disagrees with the decision of the Sharia Court they can still use all the conventional legal resources open to them, the decision passed by the Imans has no legal weight in this country, but in almost all cases, they don't because of their religious beliefs.

You can argue until your are blue in the face over whether those religious beliefs are based on fact or superstition (and I will be on the side of the latter) and whether they are right or wrong (in the case of gender equality, for instance, again I fall for the latter), but the faithful do accept all of the religious doctrines (good and bad) and so respect the court.


Park your prejudices for a moment and look at the cold, hard facts and give one cogent argument why two people shouldn't voluntarily have a dispute mediated by a third party. Then explain to me why it is any different if that third party is a religious scholar.
 


GT49er

GT49er

Well-known member
Feb 1, 2009
46,866
Gloucester
gregbrighton said:
It doesn't stop the far-right racists on this board to politicising the muslim child abuse for their own sick agenda.
Click to expand...

Geez! You have to be a far right racist to be against the sort of things that have been going on in Rotherham and other places now? Enjoy living in your strange world...............
 












WATFORD zero

WATFORD zero

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 10, 2003
25,966
keaton said:
Are people who use a Sharia court unable to use legal means later?
Click to expand...

I use Sharia law with all sorts of people, all the time. It's just that i have renamed it 'deciding between yourselves based on your moral values' or failing that, 'getting someone you both trust and who shares your moral values to decide'. If that doesn't work, then we go to court. (I don't go to court very often).

I have found that by renaming it, all sorts of people can use it, regardless of faith. Shows what re-branding can do
 
Last edited:








keaton

keaton

Big heart, hot blood and balls. Big balls
Nov 18, 2004
9,675
bashlsdir said:
I would do some further investigation then.
Click to expand...

Why?

If someone is unhappy with what happens in a Sharia Law court, they can still use all legal means open to anyone? (just like they have been able to in relation to jewish religious courts for centuries).
 


D

Deleted member 22389

Guest
keaton said:
Why?

If someone is unhappy with what happens in a Sharia Law court, they can still use all legal means open to anyone? (just like they have been able to in relation to jewish religious courts for centuries).
Click to expand...

Why are we even entertaining these places here anyway. Some people don't get the choice especially women who have come to this country.
I might add, watch the BBC Panaroma programme.
 
Last edited by a moderator:


keaton

keaton

Big heart, hot blood and balls. Big balls
Nov 18, 2004
9,675
bashlsdir said:
Why are we even entertaining these places here anyway. Some people don't get the choice especially women who have come to this country.
Click to expand...

We have done it with Jewish religious courts for years and i'm sure followers of all religions or groups ask their leaders to arbitrate on occasions. They are unfair but I don't see what banning them would achieve. Most are apparently unofficial and therefor if they were banned, they would carry on as usual.

What I would like to see is work done to let people who are being oppressed or pressured by their communities or religion given information and help to access proper legal support where necessary.
 


father_and_son

father_and_son

Well-known member
Jan 23, 2012
4,646
Under the Police Box
bashlsdir said:
Why are we even entertaining these places here anyway. Some people don't get the choice especially women who have come to this country.
Click to expand...

So chuck out the baby with the bath water?

There are some entrenched and unpalatable attitudes that persist in certain cultures that have come to this country with the immigrants from those cultures. But hey, its not like we don't have a few unpleasant attitudes persisting here already, not least the prejudiced undertones of some of the posts in this thread. That is no reason to stop religious mediation courts from operating.

And before you tell me to do my research, I have used Sharia Courts for contractual disputes and have studied Sharia Law (as it relates to certain financial transactions) for my job. They are cheaper, quicker, easier and generally a more effective way of doing business within many Islamic communities than the domestic courts, with broadly the same overall outcome.
 




D

Deleted member 22389

Guest
keaton said:
We have done it with Jewish religious courts for years and i'm sure followers of all religions or groups ask their leaders to arbitrate on occasions. They are unfair but I don't see what banning them would achieve. Most are apparently unofficial and therefor if they were banned, they would carry on as usual.

What I would like to see is work done to let people who are being oppressed or pressured by their communities or religion given information and help to access proper legal support where necessary.
Click to expand...

I agree on that part. However everyone should follow our laws regardless of religion. All we have done in this country like other countries in the EU is created extra problems because of it.
 




You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here