Search results

Absolutely. And the vast majority behave themselves.

Parents were refugees. Why is my idea odd? Any acceptance of population risk and migration to the UK carries risk. That is fact.

Maybe the point is, we can welcome more and more asylum seekers and refugees, but we will have to accept that some children may be raped, some children may be blown up at a pop concert, some gay people enjoying a picnic may be stabbed to death. Of course the vast majority of those seeking...

No it hasn’t.

The fact that so called demonising of illegal migrants has caused an illegal migrant to rape a young boy? Yes lets blame the Home Secretary for the actions of a despicable nonce. You agree with Abbot then?

An interesting opinion from Abbot. To think, she could have been our Home Secretary.

Wow

Would things have been better under Labour? Probably. Labour under Blair and Brown were firmer with migration than this lot. Although Labour did manage to get up to a 500,000 case backlog under Labour in 2006.

But hotel space and social housing will run out. Where do we accommodate people? We are not going to suddenly build hundreds of thousands of new houses in the next five years. Public spending is going to go down whilst taxes are going to go up. And we aren’t going to confiscate private...

Possibly, but it would depend on where you are from, whether there is sufficiency of protection from the authorities, whether internal relocation is viable and whether a person would form membership of a particular social group under the 1951 convention. An Albanian woman could well argue this...

You wont get granted refugee status for economic betterment. Unless you lie and cheat to try and put a compelling case across.

That is the way it has always been. No country on the planet will accept asylum claims outside of their own territory.

2022 and people are still persecuted because they believe in a different god, or because they are attracted to people of the same sex, or because they support a different political party. Pathetic.

What other grounds would Albanians need international protection for, other than trafficking claims?

20 years ago there were equal if not worse conflicts. LTTE were right at it in Sri Lanka. Zanu PF were causing havoc in Zimbabwe. Sierra Leone and Liberia were having brutal civil wars. Somalia was a seriously bad place if you were in not in a majority clan. Ethiopia and Eritreans were...

This is just nonsense. What do European countries do that we don’t when you say they are more humane and caring than we are?

According to the Home Office or Appeals Tribunal. Rather odd that that people are more likely to be granted refugee status in the UK. Perhaps we are too leniant. Is the world generally more dangerous than it was 20 years ago?

Migrants make a good distraction to all the other nonsense going on. It’ll be one of the big topics of the next election.

Which is what? We don’t take the most, but we are more likely to grant refugee status to those seeking IP. Those are the facts

It is not a competition as to who takes the most.