Search results

OK. Thanks for answering my questions so succinctly. Did I say 'answering'? I meant 'avoiding'.

I didn't ask that. I said 'Could you point us to the legislation which states that Parliament can unilaterally overturn the findings of a military court hearing?'

So the main thrust of your argument is that this is a wrongful conviction?

Could you point us to the legislation which states that Parliament can unilaterally overturn the findings of a military court hearing?

I think you're making this up as you go along. This has nothing to do with 'community cohesion', and everything to do with due process. So I'll re-state my questions - What is the case his supporters are putting up for having his murder conviction quashed? What do they expect the government...

What is the case his supporters are putting up for having his murder conviction quashed? What do they expect the government to do about it? They're not in a position to unilaterally overturn it.