I think every single person on NSC would acknowledge that the media can be manipulated to some extent. What we don't THEN do is believe every bit of utterly unfounded SHIT we find on YouTube.
Pretty sure the most major crash was back in the 30s.
Also, that still doesn't explain it. Why will it be at THIS crash? Why not another, further one in 10-15 years time?
To refuse that the concept of a coincidence exists is like saying that the sky is green and time actually goes backwards, not forwards.
That article puts forward a number of flimsy links that are more likely to be present in ANY shooting than not. At no point does it "make you think", really...
It's not decent though, is it? What makes it "decent" for you? At the start it refers to laying out the facts, then proceeds to give pretty much ZERO factual evidence pointing towards this guy being mind controlled, just "bizarre" coincidences (that aren't bizarre at all, just the usual sorta...
Not absurd at all. The FIRST thing the killer did was use tear gas, disorientating everyone. Now imagine EVERYONE
a> has a gun, b> are disorientated, and c> are firing, trying to take the killer down.
It's a dark room. The panic has caused absolute pandemonium, everyone running all over the...
If there were more guns in that cinema, there probably would've been more fatalities.
Look at the London riots - are you really suggesting that would've panned out BETTER if everyone had a gun?! It would've been much, MUCH worse.