Search results

so have you managed to quantify "slightly lower" yet? Just so I can get an idea regarding how much better I have to be, so that I don't lose out to the nigerian "jobs for the boys" theory of employment.

But i thought you said that people look after their own in these sort of situations, even if they were not of the same standard? (I quoted it..... did you not see?) Let's be honest. You don't like the fact that your opinion of what happens in the world has been contradicted. Hence your...

Ah so it's quantifiable.... the less suited for the job the others were...... and I'm not sure if you've seen the exchange rate but I am certainly not cheaper.....

So I'm a fool, because I don't act in the same way as people who IMO are dickheads? That's cool, I'd rather be a fool than a dickhead. (And I have had my convictions tested.... guess what? I work in a FOREIGN country, where I got the contract over some local guys....) But yeah you're right...

Can you elaborate please? Other human beings won't offer to help me?

"our own"? Other human beings? Yes Other people who happen to be the same racial origin or born within a vague location? No

The evidence is in the voting intentions from the data used to determine the audience.

Yes in that later post I was pointing out the inconsistencies in what someone else had written, e.g. They said supply and demand determines wages, but they also said footballers get paid too much. I didn't at any point say that I thought footballers are worth the money or that a free market...

Incorrect. In a free MARKET ECONOMY, supply and demand is what sets wages and prices. So I don't understand why you find footballers wages obscene. The market has decided. A "free" society can be something else entirely, but that's another discussion.

A more equal society is possible in a fair society. Of course it is. I believe in equality, and I do think there should be less disparity in wages. Do you really think that most CEOs are worth the vast salaries compared to what an average worker is paid? As for an "Englishman" over the others...

64%? Is that published somewhere? I saw these figures http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/ukip/11546405/Ukip-says-BBC-exposed-over-left-wing-debate-audience.html 102 were intending to vote for a left(ish) wing party. That was out of an audience of 200.

Thing is, the majority of people are liberal/centre left/left leaning. But traditionally (and as can be seen now), those votes are split across more than one party. Whereas typically most people who are right/centre right have voted tory, until now. If you look at the voting intent, then the...