In a summer where we already need quite a few new players, I don't think we should be looking to sell Ulloa, unless he is unhappy and demands a transfer.
Read back over some of the comments on this thread and you'll see what I mean. If the price is right and he wants to go, I would sell him but people seem to be assuming we'll replace him easily, which I don't think is true.
Look at the season before last and the points we got pre Ulloa and after he signed. I don't think we played that differently in the second half of the season but we had a striker who could finish off the chances. We were about 10th at Christmas and topped the league in the second half of the...
Totally agree. Norwich have the money to gamble £3 million on Grabban as they have parachute payments, we don't. He was also only that price because of a release clause.
For what it's worth, given what's happened with CMS and Ulloa, I think we'll look abroad to replace Ulloa if he leaves. I...
Or how about scored more than double any other player in our squad despite missing a third of the season through injury and hardly getting any service in many games. But lets just get rid of our top scorer because NSC says he is rubbish.
Absolutely. It's the key position for all teams and there's a lot of competition. I realise they have to let him go if he wants to leave but we need to be realistic about getting a new striker.
So why didn't we when we signed CMS? Grabban only went for £3 million because he had a clause in his contract. If Ulloa wants to leave and we get an acceptable offer, we should let him go but don't underestimate how hard it will be to sign a replacement.