Multi millionaire or not, he was 'cancelled' by Hollywood because of false alligations by AH. Since the alligations, he's lost several films and not got any new roles since.
If he lost his career through his own actions of drink, drugs and being crap, then that's a totally different situation...
WTF has that got to do with it! ? She lost so of course she'll fight, she's finally been made to pay for her lies. Especially losing in the court of public opinion.
So many points in your many post are wrong.
1. Not only were AHs medical records allowed but her personal Doctors and her own...
Fair enough, I meant the lawyers explaining the legalese,m that's all.
Actually it's the other way around. There was a lot of evidence that JD couldn't bring up in the UK trial because of a) the UK laws and b) he was suing the Sun rather than the person who made the claims. That's why he didn't...
Look at the trial itself on You Tube. There's various lawyers who comment on the trial legal proceedings as it goes along.
Anything other than looking at the trial proceedings, you are subjected to the opinions of the person who is reporting. That way you can come to your own conclusions.
As I...
Can't be arsed to get into it with you but you are 99% wrong and 1% right, with a different narrative.
Amber Heard is a viscous parasite and got everything she deserved.
Believe what you will, the facts speak for themselves and the jury correctly called it based on all of the evidence.
Can't be arsed to get into it with you but you are 99% wrong and 1% right, with a different narrative.
Amber Heard is a viscous parasite and got everything she deserved.
Believe what you will, the facts speak for themselves and the jury correctly called it based on all of the evidence.
Because JD was hung drawn and quartered by the 'Media' and had his name and reputation slaughtered, losing his job (got several films cancelled on him). The Couirt of Public Opinion found him guilty in the past. Aided by biased and sensationalistic media. If the original accusations weren't...
By your own admission, you dislike JD. I think that is clouding your judgement on this.
As for the UK case, it was not JD vs AH but JD vs The Sun and basically The Sun said 'we printed what she said' which was enough to kick it out of Court as he was not levally (unbelievably) allowed to prove...
I totally disagree. By allowing the cameras inside, people can look at the evidence and decide for themselves on the basis of the evidence and not have to listen to the biased media (such and the Gauardian article today written by a woman who herself is being sued for defamation by someone who...
Anyone been watching this on YT?
Quite fascinating tbh. I'm used to the slick lawyers you see on Hollywood movies and watching them in reality is more like cartoon network.
One of Heards lawyers even objected to his own questions yesterday. Hilarious if it wasn't so serious.
She's not coming...