He has six years to bring a case. Also, it takes quite sometime to build a case and present it ( being this will be a court case and not an ET case ). Given it's only been around 3-4 months since he was sacked it is unlikely he would have raised a case by now.
You are walking on very dodgy ground then. References about performance and ethos are subjective normally and you leave yourself open to being sued if someone fails to get a job because of your reference. If you own your own company then I hope you have very good legal insurance and if you work...
While I'm grateful for what Bloom has provided and produced, if you seriously have 100% in anyone in football then you're a) a fool and b) forgetting the clubs past
The problem being that BW hasn't said anything to prove he knows anything. I could easily say "I have an inside contact who says were signing a Bury striker with the Coke money" - would you believe me ? Of course not but it was true as were other transfer "rumours" I've posted ( see my posting...
No, clarification means reasserting, using alternative language, the same argument. You have changed from "moving on" to "not moving on" - that's back peddling.
If you were that bothered then you would have held your own council and not come on here with "I've been told something in confidence" !
Anyway, well done for turning a thread about Gus getting the Sunderland job .... possibly .... into one of your predictable bitter hate filled rants about him.