Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] Donald Trump 2024







Zeberdi

Brighton born & bred
NSC Patron
Oct 20, 2022
4,905
What was worse in the world when Trump was in power?
Environmental protection
  • Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris Agreement - Without the United States, the rest of the world had a harder time meeting the Paris Agreement’s goal of preventing global temperatures from rising more than 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels. And the United States missed out on the creation of more jobs and economic growth as well as reduced business risks. While Covid and the renewables market blunted the impact in terms of emissions, Trump’s aggressive rolling back of environmental protection policies could still have lasting impact.

Relations with Iran -
  • President Trump withdrew the United States from the deal in 2018, claiming it failed to curtail Iran’s missile program and regional influence. Iran began ignoring limitations on its nuclear program a year later. This has left the US isolated with no viable option for monitoring Iran’s programme of enrichment - Iran is closer to developing nuclear weapons now than it ever was and the reintroduction of harsh sanctions that were lifted when the JPCOA was agreed has inflammed tensions even further.

Any viable Peace Plan between Israel and Palestine

  • The proposal missed a signature feature of every prior peace plan: a path to a viable Palestinian state. It proposed dividing up the Palestinian territories and surrounding them by Israel, giving Israel total control over Palestinian security, handed a third of the West Bank over to Israel and moved the US Embassy to Jerusalem (an attempt to make that hotly contested city the de facto capital of Israel) - Trump‘s ‘Peace Plan’ destroyed any remaining hope that Israel will settle for the deal that peace processors have envisioned for a quarter century. Trump also colluded with Netanyahu, a far right wing Political leader, such that they both supported each other’s leadership, right wing policy positions/agendas, despite both being on corruption charges and likely facing criminal sanctions should they be voted out of power.
Worsened Security in Europe

  • Trump’s actions weakened Ukraine, divided NATO, emboldened Putin and helped get us to where we are today. And even with Trump no longer in office, his impact lives on in the form of Putin-friendly commentary in right wing media and from some Republican lawmakers. Within weeks, of Russia annexing Crimea (2014) Trump praised Putin and predicted that “the rest of Ukraine will fall … fairly quickly.” Echoing Kremlin propaganda, Trump said in a tv interview that the Crimean people “would rather be with Russia,” a position he pushed in private. One of his 2016 campaign aides falsely claimed that “Russia did not seize Crimea.”. Trump extorted Ukraine in 2019 to bolster his 2020 election campaign in an attempt to coerce Ukraine to provide ’dirt’ on Joe and Hunter Biden and evidence came to light of widespread corruption.





 
Last edited:


Hugo Rune

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 23, 2012
21,644
Brighton
Environmental protection
  • Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris Agreement - Without the United States, the rest of the world had a harder time meeting the Paris Agreement’s goal of preventing global temperatures from rising more than 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels. And the United States missed out on the creation of more jobs and economic growth as well as reduced business risks. While Covid and the renewables market blunted the impact in terms of emissions, Trump’s aggressive rolling back of environmental protection policies could still have lasting impact.

Relations with Iran -
  • President Trump withdrew the United States from the deal in 2018, claiming it failed to curtail Iran’s missile program and regional influence. Iran began ignoring limitations on its nuclear program a year later. This has left the US isolated with no viable option for monitoring Iran’s programme of enrichment - Iran is closer to developing nuclear weapons now than it ever was and the reintroduction of harsh sanctions that were lifted when the JPCOA was agreed has inflammed tensions even further.

Any viable Peace Plan between Israel and Palestine

  • The proposal missed a signature feature of every prior peace plan: a path to a viable Palestinian state. It proposed dividing up the Palestinian territories and surrounding them by Israel, giving Israel total control over Palestinian security, handed a third of the West Bank over to Israel and moved the US Embassy to Jerusalem (an attempt to make that hotly contested city the de facto capital of Israel) - Trump‘s ‘Peace Plan’ destroyed any remaining hope that Israel will settle for the deal that peace processors have envisioned for a quarter century. Trump also colluded with Netanyahu, a far right wing Political leader, such that they both supported each other’s leadership, right wing policy positions/agendas, despite both being on corruption charges and likely facing criminal sanctions should they be voted out of power.
Worsened Security in Europe

  • Trump’s actions weakened Ukraine, divided NATO, emboldened Putin and helped get us to where we are today. And even with Trump no longer in office, his impact lives on in the form of Putin-friendly commentary in right wing media and from some Republican lawmakers. Within weeks, of Russia annexing Crimea (2014) Trump praised Putin and predicted that “the rest of Ukraine will fall … fairly quickly.” Echoing Kremlin propaganda, Trump said in a tv interview that the Crimean people “would rather be with Russia,” a position he pushed in private. One of his 2016 campaign aides falsely claimed that “Russia did not seize Crimea.”. Trump extorted Ukraine in 2019 to bolster his 2020 election campaign in an attempt to coerce Ukraine to provide ’dirt’ on Joe and Hunter Biden and evidence came to light of widespread corruption.





A restrained response (in terms of length) seeing that the question could easily warrant a book sized response!
 


chickens

Intending to survive this time of asset strippers
Oct 12, 2022
1,875
Perhaps I could refer you to my earlier post re. American definitions of ‘socialism’ and the table of definitions I posted - there really is a cross Atlantic divide I think in how we are defining these terms - the term can have very different meanings to different people, so much so, I am not even sure they are helpful any more. The terms ‘left’ and ‘right’ in American politics is also contextual. In fact, the right of political spectrum proponents will often just use the term ‘socialism’ as a derogatory term for anything left of their centre. We have never had a socialist society in the UK (as defined by Clause 4) of course, only political parties who are closer in policies to the ideology than others - so in practice, it is all a spectrum, the characterisation of which, very much influenced by where we ourselves stand on that spectrum.

The Republicans have some very fundamental Christian conservatives on the ‘right’ of the party conversely, the Dems have politicians on the left of the Party, who platform on what might be regarded as more ‘socialist’ on the spectrum eg. Bernie Saunders and AOC who both have a small but hardcore following in the Democratic party.

I would like to ask @lasvegan to define what he means by ‘socialism’ and accept that it might be a different definition to one you or I might have?

Thanks Zeb, but while I accept that the meaning of words can evolve over time, and take on different meanings in certain settings, I don’t believe in allowing politicians who are effectively attempting to smear their opponents to completely redefine words and effectively get away with those smears.

The “when I said socialist, I meant someone with views different to my own” defence shall not stand.

You’ll note a complete absence of me describing @lasvegan as a fascist/nazi on here, and that’s because I don’t believe he’s either of those things. All I’m asking for is that we cut through the hyperbole and deal with the reality.

Biden, unpopular though he is, has genuinely overseen an effective tenure in Government. His policies may be designed to help America’s poorer families, but that does not make him or his policies socialist. Even most capitalists recognise that too much inequality stifles demand, that’s not a socialist thing.
 


Zeberdi

Brighton born & bred
NSC Patron
Oct 20, 2022
4,905
Thanks Zeb, but while I accept that the meaning of words can evolve over time, and take on different meanings in certain settings, I don’t believe in allowing politicians who are effectively attempting to smear their opponents to completely redefine words and effectively get away with those smears.

The “when I said socialist, I meant someone with views different to my own” defence shall not stand.

You’ll note a complete absence of me describing @lasvegan as a fascist/nazi on here, and that’s because I don’t believe he’s either of those things. All I’m asking for is that we cut through the hyperbole and deal with the reality.
Yes, I totally see what you are saying and I get that but my point is more of a general one.

I just wanted to highlight that Americans have redefined ‘socialism’ - there simply isn’t an homogeneous understanding of the term and it is more concrete than just ‘settings’ - maybe read the article I posted. Our ‘Clause 4’ understanding of ’socialism’ doesn’t even come into American discourse. Right wing American politicians as British ones, use ‘socialism’ as a general slur against any politician/party espousing left wing politics. The term ‘fascism’ has also been misappropriated as a derogatory term used by left wing ideologists to slur hard right politics. I’m just saying, these terms can be very undefined, redefined and unrefined in modern political debate and often have no relation to the root ideology from which they spring..

I did also note that you were called a ‘socialist’ in a deliberately derogatory manner by @lasvegan (for which he has admitted and qualified). Sorry if I didn’t recognise that insult to you in my response.

I’m merely pointing out that it is much easier to have a dialogue about political ideologies if both sides can at least have a common understanding on the fundamental terms being used - otherwise people simply end up shouting across a canyon and listening to their own echoes.

I think we are probably on the same page tbh. 🙂
 




Zeberdi

Brighton born & bred
NSC Patron
Oct 20, 2022
4,905
A restrained response (in terms of length) seeing that the question could easily warrant a book sized response!
I could write more if you like - you know I could 🤪😂
 


BadFish

Huge Member
Oct 19, 2003
17,132
The point I was trying to make is that the Democrat Party is leaning towards totalitarianism, one party rule.

This is a huge statement to make with no information to back it up.

Got to say I would need some convincing of this being true.

Everyone can agree that they are are doing their best to imprison their main political opponent.

I think that suggesting 'everyone' can agree is a massive stretch. More like a small percentage of people would agree.
 


Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
50,313
Faversham
Yes, I totally see what you are saying and I get that but my point is more of a general one.

I just wanted to highlight that Americans have redefined ‘socialism’ - there simply isn’t an homogeneous understanding of the term and it is more concrete than just ‘settings’ - maybe read the article I posted. Our ‘Clause 4’ understanding of ’socialism’ doesn’t even come into American discourse. Right wing American politicians as British ones, use ‘socialism’ as a general slur against any politician/party espousing left wing politics. The term ‘fascism’ has also been misappropriated as a derogatory term used by left wing ideologists to slur hard right politics. I’m just saying, these terms can be very undefined, redefined and unrefined in modern political debate and often have no relation to the root ideology from which they spring..

I did also note that you were called a ‘socialist’ in a deliberately derogatory manner by @lasvegan (for which he has admitted and qualified). Sorry if I didn’t recognise that insult to you in my response.

I’m merely pointing out that it is much easier to have a dialogue about political ideologies if both sides can at least have a common understanding on the fundamental terms being used - otherwise people simply end up shouting across a canyon and listening to their own echoes.

I think we are probably on the same page tbh. 🙂
I agree about the slurs. And I find @lasvegan interesting. I can myself construct a defense of voting for Trump based on perceived personal benefit. If that's his position, fine. But I start to sigh when the slurs start to appear. For example, Lasvegan claiming the Democrats want a one party state. What rubbish!

More lovely weather today on the Eastern side of blighty. Time to enjoy it :rave:
 




Stat Brother

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
73,840
West west west Sussex
This is a huge statement to make with no information to back it up.

Got to say I would need some convincing of this being true.
Esp from a supporter of the President who incited an attempted coup and who's stated aim is to pardon all those who took part (after he's pardoned himself first, of course)
 


marlowe

Well-known member
Dec 13, 2015
3,938
I visited the website which is hawking the Trump endorsed bible and on the Frequently Asked Questions page one of those frequently asked questions is "What if my bible has sticky pages?".

The only reading material which is usually associated with sticky pages is used pornographic magazines which begs the question what dubious purpose those Trump devotees who are buying His bible are actually using it for?


20240402_124811.jpg
 


US Seagull

Well-known member
Jul 17, 2003
3,332
Cleveland, OH




Me Atome

Member
Mar 10, 2024
45
No it's not what we vote for.
We only vote for it when the Conservative government has shit the bed so badly we all crave a reset but don't have the stones to go all in Socialist.
It's where we are at now, where we were post Major and where we will be in 25 years time.
As someone else noted, we are a bit off topic, but whilst we are here....

I wouldn't argue with you but I suppose it's a question of what we would call a Right of Centre socialist government.

I accept that many won't accept that any Conservative government can ever be considered socialist, whatever it does, but that's a matter of opinion.
 


Crawley Dingo

Political thread tourist.
Mar 31, 2022
596
Perhaps a good start would be telling us why you are so vested in a Trump presidency (to the extent that you are) when you are not living in the US or are American - or are you?
You first, why are you so invested in seeing a foreign presidential candidate removed by lawfare(Electoral interference.) when you don't live there?
 


Bodian

Well-known member
May 3, 2012
11,884
Cumbria
You first, why are you so invested in seeing a foreign presidential candidate removed when you don't live there?
I think @Zerberdi has answered that in post #2756 a couple of pages back where they listed many reasons why they didn't consider Trump was a good president for America or the World.

You first, why are you so invested in seeing a foreign presidential candidate removed by lawfare(Electoral interference.) when you don't live there?
The highlighted bit is your subjective view, and unfair to include in one question - because if we try an answer the question as edited above, without removing the subjective bit - you could justifiably say that we had 'accepted' the lawfare point of view. Which I certainly haven't - and reading @Zeberdi 's posts - I don't think they have either.

Anyway - onto the football.
 




Zeberdi

Brighton born & bred
NSC Patron
Oct 20, 2022
4,905
You first, why are you so invested in seeing a foreign presidential candidate removed …when you don't live there?
Because half my family live in the States - because his Jan 6 attempt at interrupting the peaceful transition of power was a threat to the liberal democratic Country they live in. Because they are Jewish and don’t want to continue living in a Country where the President of that Country dog whistles to neo-Nazis and White Supremacists.

For all the reasons I bullet-pointed over the page as @Bodian says a post that you didn’t read btw because you were more interested in instructing me how to write posts on NSC at the time iir. 🙄

Now you - answer my question- why are you so supportive of a foreign ex-President and so vested in him getting back into power?
 


lasvegan

Well-known member
Jan 30, 2009
1,922
Sin City
I did also note that you were called a ‘socialist’ in a deliberately derogatory manner by @lasvegan (for which he has admitted and qualified).
I didn’t mean it to be derogatory, just calling it as I see it. People ARE socialist, communist, Marxist, authoritarian, totalitarian, or whatever you want to call it. It’s no more of a slur than calling me a capitalist.
 


lasvegan

Well-known member
Jan 30, 2009
1,922
Sin City
I agree about the slurs. And I find @lasvegan interesting. I can myself construct a defense of voting for Trump based on perceived personal benefit. If that's his position, fine. But I start to sigh when the slurs start to appear. For example, Lasvegan claiming the Democrats want a one party state. What rubbish!
So you find me interesting, yet sigh…a little condescending maybe?
 


Springal

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2005
23,902
GOSBTS




Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
50,313
Faversham
So you find me interesting, yet sigh…a little condescending maybe?
It's the slurs against Biden.

If you can stand resolutely behind your choice for Trump, using cold rational reasoning, there is no need to underpin it with slurs.

You make a mistake by changing the contest to 'who is the most corrupt' and 'who is the most disgusting'. That one is easy - its Trump

Stick with competence to deliver to you, personally, the greater advantage, or you invite me to question your otherwise perverse affection for the pussy grabber.
 


Stat Brother

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
73,840
West west west Sussex
That's the thing.

I reckon I could be easily talked out of #TeamBiden, the problem being those doing the talking are pro Trump, which is where their entire argument falls down.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here