[Politics] The General Election Thread

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

How are you voting?

  • Conservative and Unionist Party

    Votes: 176 32.3%
  • Labour Party

    Votes: 146 26.8%
  • Liberal Democrat’s

    Votes: 139 25.5%
  • Green Party

    Votes: 44 8.1%
  • Independent Candidate

    Votes: 4 0.7%
  • Monster Raving Looney Party

    Votes: 7 1.3%
  • Other

    Votes: 29 5.3%

  • Total voters
    545
  • Poll closed .






Lincoln Imp

Well-known member
Feb 2, 2009
5,964
Looks to me as though the key factor in those numbers is the growth in Lib Dem votes, presumably hard core 'revoker's? I'd imagine once it becomes obvious that Lib Dems cannot win in that seat, the number will dwindle considerably - with votes switching to Labour as the only viable 'chance of remain' option.

I'd imagine both parties will lose a few to Brexit party, but probably not enough to make the difference.

All guesswork and assumption of course, like every other prediction so far. So many factors at play!

I passed a group of Brexiters displaying posters and banners and handing out leaflets in a Sussex village High Street on Saturday morning and I wondered why they were there. Arundel and South Downs has a 24,000 Tory majority - although some polls are show the LibDems, a poor third last time, closing in dramatically - and narrowly voted Remain in the referendum. The only possible effect of the Brexit Party is to increase the slender chance of a LibDem upset. I wish them well.

I admire their sense of participation too. The Times this morning says that the Brexit Party should stand down to allow the Tories to sweep home. Patronising garbage. If voters are intelligent and discerning people (and we are assured they are) then the greater the choice the better. It is marker of these revolting times that a respected newspaper should be demanding that people with an entirely legal set of beliefs should be denied a party to vote for, all on the grounds of expediency.
 


shingle

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2004
3,146
Lewes
Another Emily Thornberry car crash interview on GMB this morning re Labour's position on Trident, only eclipsed by her question time explanation of Labour's position on Brexit.:facepalm:

Personally, I respect jezzas stance on trident, but just be honest with people and say you're gonna cancel trident and spend the money on schools, nhs etc. He's not a man of principle.
 


Kalimantan Gull

Well-known member
Aug 13, 2003
13,018
Central Borneo / the Lizard
Looks to me as though the key factor in those numbers is the growth in Lib Dem votes, presumably hard core 'revoker's? I'd imagine once it becomes obvious that Lib Dems cannot win in that seat, the number will dwindle considerably - with votes switching to Labour as the only viable 'chance of remain' option.

I'd imagine both parties will lose a few to Brexit party, but probably not enough to make the difference.

All guesswork and assumption of course, like every other prediction so far. So many factors at play!

Could be. That site had labour votes falling by 4000, brexit increasing by 4000 and tories staying the same. Just an algorithm that probably works in Workington but not in Woodingdean is my guess. But we shall see
 


BLOCK F

Well-known member
Feb 26, 2009
6,403
I passed a group of Brexiters displaying posters and banners and handing out leaflets in a Sussex village High Street on Saturday morning and I wondered why they were there. Arundel and South Downs has a 24,000 Tory majority - although some polls are show the LibDems, a poor third last time, closing in dramatically - and narrowly voted Remain in the referendum. The only possible effect of the Brexit Party is to increase the slender chance of a LibDem upset. I wish them well.

I admire their sense of participation too. The Times this morning says that the Brexit Party should stand down to allow the Tories to sweep home. Patronising garbage. If voters are intelligent and discerning people (and we are assured they are) then the greater the choice the better. It is marker of these revolting times that a respected newspaper should be demanding that people with an entirely legal set of beliefs should be denied a party to vote for, all on the grounds of expediency.

The actual headline quote was 'Nigel Farage should withdraw his Brexit Party candidates from the election or risk seeing the cause to which he has devoted his career end in failure'.
The only reason I suggest you are keen to see the Brexit Party stand against the Conservatives is so that they take a number of votes away from them and possibly deny Johnson a majority which could result in Brexit not happening.
Nothing wrong in that, but why not just be honest about it instead of calling it patronising garbage?
P.S.I voted Remain.
 




Mellor 3 Ward 4

Well-known member
Jul 27, 2004
9,860
saaf of the water
Another Emily Thornberry car crash interview on GMB this morning re Labour's position on Trident, only eclipsed by her question time explanation of Labour's position on Brexit.:facepalm:

Personally, I respect jezzas stance on trident, but just be honest with people and say you're gonna cancel trident and spend the money on schools, nhs etc. He's not a man of principle.

I didn't see that - but I did hear her on Today where she really struggled to give any credible answers to Nick Robinson.
 


Blue Valkyrie

Not seen such Bravery!
Sep 1, 2012
32,165
Valhalla
I didn't see that - but I did hear her on Today where she really struggled to give any credible answers to Nick Robinson.
That interview helped me to rule out voting for Corbyn.

So,

Johnson - ruled out.
Corbyn - ruled out.

LibDem - maybe.
Green - maybe.
Spoil - maybe.
 


Chicken Run

Member Since Jul 2003
NSC Patron
Jul 17, 2003
18,624
Valley of Hangleton
But the BBC coverage this morning is showing him laying a wreath from 2016 and not yesterday, wonder why ???

656675807c2cc7572dc6980161ca9a0b.jpg
 




Bozza

You can change this
Helpful Moderator
Jul 4, 2003
55,907
Back in Sussex
Another Emily Thornberry car crash interview on GMB this morning re Labour's position on Trident, only eclipsed by her question time explanation of Labour's position on Brexit.:facepalm:

Personally, I respect jezzas stance on trident, but just be honest with people and say you're gonna cancel trident and spend the money on schools, nhs etc. He's not a man of principle.

Labour do seem remarkably proficient at putting people up for media duties who seem ridiculously ill-prepared and/or just not very good. I'm not suggesting the Tories don't do the same, but Labour seem to do it a LOT.

In stark contrast I heard Grant Schapps on 5Live whilst out walking the dog yesterday morning and he was very polished indeed. Slippery as a fish, obviously, but very accomplished.
 


clapham_gull

Legacy Fan
Aug 20, 2003
25,491
Labour do seem remarkably proficient at putting people up for media duties who seem ridiculously ill-prepared and/or just not very good. I'm not suggesting the Tories don't do the same, but Labour seem to do it a LOT.

In stark contrast I heard Grant Schapps on 5Live whilst out walking the dog yesterday morning and he was very polished indeed. Slippery as a fish, obviously, but very accomplished.

Is he using his real name these days ?

https://www.theguardian.com/politic...cond-job-as-millioniare-web-marketer-while-mp
 


hans kraay fan club

The voice of reason.
Helpful Moderator
Mar 16, 2005
61,644
Chandlers Ford
Labour do seem remarkably proficient at putting people up for media duties who seem ridiculously ill-prepared and/or just not very good. I'm not suggesting the Tories don't do the same,...
.

The Tories vote them party leader!
 
















Blue Valkyrie

Not seen such Bravery!
Sep 1, 2012
32,165
Valhalla
Well that’s it then. Farage bottling it has removed any slim chance of an upset and handed it on a plate to the nasty party. Brexit done and 5 more years of misery, so depressing.
At least it removes the compulsion to scrawl *F off Farage* all over the Brexit Ltd logo on the ballot paper.
 


shingle

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2004
3,146
Lewes
With all the talk of people voting tactically on all sides, this is really great news. Well done Nige, good to see you've seen sense.
 






Guinness Boy

Tofu eating wokerati
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
Jul 23, 2003
34,578
Up and Coming Sunny Portslade
Sounds like Farage is bottling it.

Sounds to me like he actually had no confidence in over half of the assorted nutjobs, bellends, racists, conspiracy theorists and general wankpuffins he was putting forward as candidates.

I'm not sure, however, that it makes more sense. 317 is not a majority and there is now a risk of a semi-competant Brexiteer splitting the right wing vote in Labour held marginals.

Still, just goes to show you can't trust a single word that Farage says.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top