Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Palace] Palace tell players to pay up to keep playing
- Thread starter A1X
- Start date
Grombleton
Surrounded by <div>s
- Dec 31, 2011
- 7,356
I'm surprised that our Palace friends don't think that the women are just there to make sure the men's kit is washed and ready for matchday.
Get your house right and support the women the way a proper club should.
Get your house right and support the women the way a proper club should.
Sheebo
Well-known member
- Jul 13, 2003
- 29,297
South coast chums - or several national media outlets?
What’s the palace managers name and why does he get extra characters on twitter?
Drumstick
NORTHSTANDER
In a foul mood today and this post has cheered me right up! Thanks!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The Large One
Who's Next?
Palace Ladies are semi-professional footballers. It's one of the stipulations of being in the second tier of women's football.
Jesus wept, you're easy to pick off.
The Large One
Who's Next?
The CPLFC website begs to differ.
You couldn't pick a winner in a one horse race.
You originally started off arguing one point and are now arguing something else. You originally started by blaming CPFC, when in fact they are separate entities. Either way, the ladies are required to pay subs or gain sponsorship of £250. This has always been and will be raised by various groups.
Last edited:
Thick as shit
Baldseagull
Well-known member
It is quite normal to have player sponsorship, I don't know how usual it is to ask the Ladies to go out and get it themselves though, and to tell them if they can't get sponsorship, to front the money themselves or not be included.
The Large One
Who's Next?
A totally meaningless post.
It's you who keeps changing the subject. For a start, you've spent a lot of time trying to convince yourself it's such a non-story. We know there is a story, which is why it's being discussed. Just because you're not interested in your own club's ongoing financial issues, it doesn't follow that those who matter - i.e. those involved - aren't either.
Additionally, it's not good form for a semi-professional set-up within the club for the players to have to find sponsorship, when it is the responsibility of the sponsorship staff to do that.
Meanwhile, back in the real world, CPLFC refer to Crystal Palace FC as their 'parent club'. I haven't made that up, it's what they say. I can't help it if you don't believe that. If your best response is to say 'thick as shit' - as if that has any meaning here - you don't really have a great deal to contribute to this, with the exception your ongoing, 'I don't give a shit about women's football' white noise.
Hold on a second. This is the same Swills who was complaining about people becoming insulting when proved wrong just the other day (despite the fact that he's never once proved anyone wrong on this forum).
Anyway, after getting yet another schooling, he's reverted to hypocritical type yet again. It's very sad.
It's obvious I'm not going to convince you so I will just give up. But for the last time CPFC and CPFCL are two separate entities.
It is a non story as it has been like this for a long time and every club in the league they play in raise their own sponsorship, though I have read apart from maybe Man U.
So it's a non story as far as you are trying to point it to us having financial difficulties, they have been raising their own sponsorship for god knows how long. One of their sponsors is one of our investor's. I suppose that every club in that league is having financial difficulties then?
As for me saying you are thick as shit is irrelevant, so is you calling me an airhead.
When I say I don't really give a shit about women's football, that's just me being honest. Let's face it not a lot of people do, otherwise the question of them raising £250 per player would not even be discussed.
I was not the one who started with the insult. I have not been schooled as he is wrong. Apart from that carry on Pike.
Juan Albion
Chicken Sniffer 3rd Class
One of your investor's what? His caravan business? His puppy? His mistress? And why do you only have one investor?
Aveacarlin'
New member
- Jul 5, 2011
- 1,177
Exactly.
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
It would appear the ladies club is independent of CPFC 2010
Then I suggest they become Bromley Ladies FC, as soon as physically possible.
Joey Jo Jo Jr. Shabadoo
Waxing chumps like candles since ‘75
- Oct 4, 2003
- 11,123
But there is an article on the Palace website that says they are funded almost entirely by CPFC. We now know why it’s almost entirely. So they may well be a separate company but they finances appear to be very tightly linked with CPFC 2010.
Please stop spreading false rumours. CPFCL are definitely owned by CPFC, somebody who has no idea told me so on here.
