Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Conspiracy Theorists



mejonaNO12 aka riskit

Well-known member
Dec 4, 2003
21,503
England
Of the days events, must've been on some computers or notepad, easier to get rid of it all in one go plus sell the plot to a millionaire

Sent from my SM-A310F using Tapatalk
So the evidence of the biggest conspiracy of all time was kept at the location of the event.
 




Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
50,207
Goldstone
Of the days events, must've been on some computers or notepad, easier to get rid of it all in one go plus sell the plot to a millionaire
But if the evidence was there, in the CIA offices, simply don't let people come and look at it. The CIA don't let tourist go and read there files. However, if you demolish a building, those notepads don't disintegrate, they'd drop down with the rubble, and members of the public could find them in the clean up operation, so that would be the worst way to hide the evidence.

If you wanted to destroy evidence, surely the easiest thing would be to use a shredder and then burn the paper etc. The building had already burned for hours anyway, so there wouldn't have been much left, it makes no sense to then blow it up.

Russia had evidence of their WC bid, so they destroyed all the laptops used, job done, they didn't need to blow up any buildings.
 
Last edited:


Wrong-Direction

Well-known member
Mar 10, 2013
13,427
But if the evidence was there, in the CIA offices, simply don't let people come and look at it. The CIA don't let tourist go and read there files. However, if you demolish a building, those notepads don't disintegrate, they'd drop down with the rubble, and members of the public could find them in the clean up operation, so that would be the worst way to hide the evidence.

If you wanted to destroy evidence, surely the easiest thing would be to use a shredder and then burn the paper etc. The building had already burned for our anyway, so there wouldn't have been much left, it makes no sense to then blow it up.

Russia had evidence of their WC bid, so they destroyed all the laptops used, job done, they didn't need to blow up any buildings.
Hmm yeah good point

Sent from my SM-A310F using Tapatalk
 


brighton fella

New member
Mar 20, 2009
1,645
It's impossible to argue with CT junkies just as it is impossible to argue with religionists. Facts and logic will never disuade them of something they have convinced themselves to be true. Faith trumps everything.

Might as well stop now and save yourself time and frustration. There is nothing in it for you.

I sincerely wish i could change my logic of thought trust me, I don't like the idea of this being a conspiracy any more than you do. I am a realist and if negative thoughts are part and parcel of being a realist so be it.
 


beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
35,315
But if the evidence was there, in the CIA offices, simply don't let people come and look at it. The CIA don't let tourist go and read there files. However, if you demolish a building, those notepads don't disintegrate, they'd drop down with the rubble, and members of the public could find them in the clean up operation, so that would be the worst way to hide the evidence.

If you wanted to destroy evidence, surely the easiest thing would be to use a shredder and then burn the paper etc. The building had already burned for our anyway, so there wouldn't have been much left, it makes no sense to then blow it up.

Russia had evidence of their WC bid, so they destroyed all the laptops used, job done, they didn't need to blow up any buildings.

you dont realise, they had evidence of aliens in the building, they had to destroy all trace of it. thats why they used the Project Odin sonic weapon to destroy all the buildings, the main target was always WTC7, WTC1&2 were just cover and created the necessary story to chase after bin laden to take over the poppy fields of Afghanistan. CIA has control all narcotics trades since the 30's, they are dopping us one way or another for years, in water, in food, in air, they control it all. look whats happening in Cuba, they've stolen prototypes of the technology, and using it on the US there! they'll be exporting the tech to Venezuela and thats when everything will get real interesting, they'll become the new regional superpower.
 




Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
50,207
Goldstone
I sincerely wish i could change my logic of thought trust me, I don't like the idea of this being a conspiracy any more than you do. I am a realist and if negative thoughts are part and parcel of being a realist so be it.
On that point, and that point alone, I don't criticise you. I don't think you should be changing your mind simply because people tell you to, you should be your own person and work out what you think.

Quite how you can dismiss all the evidence we've provided though I don't know. Oh well, live and let live.
 


Megazone

On his last warning
Jan 28, 2015
8,679
Northern Hemisphere.
you dont realise, they had evidence of aliens in the building, they had to destroy all trace of it. thats why they used the Project Odin sonic weapon to destroy all the buildings, the main target was always WTC7, WTC1&2 were just cover and created the necessary story to chase after bin laden to take over the poppy fields of Afghanistan. CIA has control all narcotics trades since the 30's, they are dopping us one way or another for years, in water, in food, in air, they control it all. look whats happening in Cuba, they've stolen prototypes of the technology, and using it on the US there! they'll be exporting the tech to Venezuela and thats when everything will get real interesting, they'll become the new regional superpower.

You need to lay off the weed and maybe go for a psychological assessment too.
You've clearly failed at school and this is your sad way of dealing with your failings.
You and your crew are all the same. Why not go outside and experience the real world like us lot?

Oh, and stay off the glue too.
 


beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
35,315
You need to lay off the weed and maybe go for a psychological assessment too.
You've clearly failed at school and this is your sad way of dealing with your failings.
You and your crew are all the same. Why not go outside and experience the real world like us lot?

Oh, and stay off the glue too.

dont be so dismissive, they are everywhere, they poison the air with contrails, the water with fluoride, the food with additives, all to maintain control of you. you just blindly accept it. open your mind to the reality of whats been happening for decades and is happening right now.
 






Megazone

On his last warning
Jan 28, 2015
8,679
Northern Hemisphere.
dont be so dismissive, they are everywhere, they poison the air with contrails, the water with fluoride, the food with additives, all to maintain control of you. you just blindly accept it. open your mind to the reality of whats been happening for decades and is happening right now.

You are clearly Brunswick, Rosa, the truth and Falmer's latest account!

Ha ha ha. You can't fool me you idiotic, Nutcase, tinfoil hatter loony boon.
 








colinz

Banned
Oct 17, 2010
862
Auckland
This begs the question, why bother with planes? Surely it would have been far easier to demolish the towers and then blame it on a successful bomb plot. No need to take the gamble off fooling thousands in to thinking they saw something they didn't. No need for suspect CGI footage. The bonus with this would have been that one of the terrorist organisations would have claimed responsibility for the bombs within a few hours.

There you go again using your own logistical (flawed) analysis, to ignore any of the science and say there were planes, present me with the scientific proof.

Do you really think a Jumbo Jet can fly into a building and have its nose cone exiting the other side unscathed with no deceleration. Cutting through load bearing Columns of reinforced steel and slicing it's way through concrete floors ?This is the basic science that you can't understand.

That said I have still not seen anything that has any depth of evidence that is making me question the accepted wisdom of what happened that day.

That's because you think Jumbo Jets can disappear inside buildings.

If you don't feel the onus is on you to prove anything then I can't help but wonder what your intentions are on this thread?

What do I have to prove ? That planes cannot fly into and disappear inside buildings.

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

 
Last edited:


colinz

Banned
Oct 17, 2010
862
Auckland
No it wasn't. They had a list of every passenger on the flight (or if I go along with your theory for a second, they could say they did) and having a passport to show is nothing different to saying the person's name was on the flight list. The passport could have been an innocent passengers instead of one of the terrorists, so again, having a passport proves nothing, so there'd be no point in doing it.

In a previous post (below) you said that Mohamed Atta's passport probably fell out of the Cockpit when the nose cone exited the building, because that's where the hijackers were.

(Thirdly, didn't the front of one of the planes go through the building? The hijackers would have been there, so their passport would have exited the building straight away)

It's actually the footage of UA175 that has it's nose cone exiting the building. Mohammed Atta was at the controls of AA11, or do you think that UA175 & AA11 both flew into the Towers & exited the other side ?
 
Last edited:








Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
50,207
Goldstone
In a previous post (below) you said that Mohamed Atta's passport probably fell out of the Cockpit when the nose cone exited the building, because that's where the hijackers were.

It's actually the footage of UA175 that has it's nose cone exiting the building. Mohammed Atta was at the controls of AA11, or do you think that UA175 & AA11 both flew into the Towers & exited the other side ?
No I was just guessing as to a possible explanation as to why a passport could be found. Is it possible a passport could be found intact, yes it is. Would it make any sense for authorities to make it up, no it wouldn't.
 


Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
50,207
Goldstone
Already seen one about it being faked.
I saw a video of a lady who was interviewed and claimed to be there during the 'shooting'. She was actually laughing during the interview. Therefore, she was an actress and the whole thing has been made up.
 




BadFish

Huge Member
Oct 19, 2003
17,127
I saw a video of a lady who was interviewed and claimed to be there during the 'shooting'. She was actually laughing during the interview. Therefore, she was an actress and the whole thing has been made up.
I saw a post on Facebook from the friend of a couple of kids killed at Sandy Hook. Can you believe they are still paying the actors and they are staying in character. They are certainly thorough in their conspiracies...... Except, of course, when they don't CGI their footage properly, leave a passport where it couldn't possibly be or when they get people walking round and round buildings, then they are a bit also dash.

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
 


Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
50,207
Goldstone
Can't believe the videos online claiming this was by the government or fake etc.

So, brighton fella, have you decided that this Vegas shooting was faked yet? Or that it was done by the government?
 
Last edited:


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here