Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Trump
- Thread starter ShandyH
- Start date
The money trail Mensch and Claude Taylor are following at the moment is pretty interesting to be fair.
http://edition.cnn.com/2017/05/04/politics/rohrabacher-prevezon/index.html
What stuff was that?
Papa Lazarou
Living in a De Zerbi wonderland
Just stuff, ok? We don't appreciate facts here.
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...fficer-trump-team-n782851?cid=sm_npd_nn_tw_ma
Russian Lawyer Brought Ex-Soviet Counter Intelligence Officer to Trump Team Meeting
Russian Lawyer Brought Ex-Soviet Counter Intelligence Officer to Trump Team Meeting
looney
Banned
- Jul 7, 2003
- 15,652
Yes badly worded. Lose strikes, safe seats in bi-elections, arguments over the economy.
looney
Banned
- Jul 7, 2003
- 15,652
Still a nothing Burger.
The left didn't lose the economic argument with Maggie. They had a left economic policy and she had a right economic theory. As one would expect.
It was about the Miltons. Friedman for her and Keynes for the opposition.
looney
Banned
- Jul 7, 2003
- 15,652
They lost every economic argument starting with the 300 Keynsian economists letter to the Times stating the economy was about to collapse and finishing with the collapse of the Soviet Union. The govs Short term financial strategy based loosley on Friedmans quantity theory of money worked in that it appeared to reduce inflation on trend even though it didn't make the targets. Most of thatchers supply side reforms had nothing to do with Friedman and more to do with Hayek.
They didn't lose they had a different policy and they certainly didn't lose on the 16th September 1992.
Tom Hark Preston Park
Will Post For Cash
- Jul 6, 2003
- 70,314
Claude Taylor has balls of steel IMHO. Not only does he make no bones whatsoever about his stated aims of supporting the patriotic Deep State in bringing down first Trump and then Putin, he also publicises on his twitter feed the dates he'll be attending small town art fayres to sell his photography wares. Where he then accepts jars of home made jam from little old ladies. Sake! I really do fear for the bloke's safety. A true hero of our times.
Sad thing is that the scrabble to criticise Trump for everything has led to a situation where people are getting used to or tired of another attack on Trump.
Plus it plays perfectly into his diversionary tactics. In order to take on Trump you need to separate him from his core support. His core support aren't bothered about whether a comment about Macron's wife is offensive. Trump could pretty much say or do anything and they'd cite Hilary or point to Obama or call it fake news.
But what about that wall? What about repealing Obamacare?
These are the things which will irk them but all the time the media outlets are reacting to another suggestion about Russia or another tweet they aren't focusing on these election pledges which would affect his polling from this core group. Now Trump knows this, I wouldn't be surprised if he was deliberately keeping them away from these areas by tossing in the occasional tweet to keep the media eye away.
Plus it plays perfectly into his diversionary tactics. In order to take on Trump you need to separate him from his core support. His core support aren't bothered about whether a comment about Macron's wife is offensive. Trump could pretty much say or do anything and they'd cite Hilary or point to Obama or call it fake news.
But what about that wall? What about repealing Obamacare?
These are the things which will irk them but all the time the media outlets are reacting to another suggestion about Russia or another tweet they aren't focusing on these election pledges which would affect his polling from this core group. Now Trump knows this, I wouldn't be surprised if he was deliberately keeping them away from these areas by tossing in the occasional tweet to keep the media eye away.
Keep up to date.
That announcement was early December last year. Early days in for Trump and a nothing burger. The deal had been made in October and they just announced it again for a billionaires love in. The investment is yet to happen. Not sure what that image on the right portrays.
http://uk.businessinsider.com/softb...nvestment-not-what-it-seems-2016-12?r=US&IR=T
Juan Albion
Chicken Sniffer 3rd Class
...
2-0 made more sense than a lot of posts on here.
looney
Banned
- Jul 7, 2003
- 15,652
Not really relevant to my post which shows CNN using an economic fallacy to spin 50.000 jobs created into a transfer. Whats wrong with Billionaires creating jobs or a love in as you say?
Stato
Well-known member
- Dec 21, 2011
- 6,590
looney
Banned
- Jul 7, 2003
- 15,652
Maybe this will help all you fake news fans see through all the hogwash.
http://www.snopes.com/2017/07/12/trump-lies/
http://www.snopes.com/2017/07/12/trump-lies/