I don't have to publish my tax return. Nor should he.
If that is the wreckage you are clinging to... good luck!
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
The Jeremy Corbyn thread
- Thread starter Simster
- Start date
If that is the wreckage you are clinging to... good luck!
Ernest
Stupid IDIOT
I think ALL Mods should PUBLISH their TAX returns
[emoji23]
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/30002...hows-jeremy-corbyn-is-turning-off-supporters/
Labour haemorrhaging members.
Neville's Breakfast
Well-known member
If true it may be those for whom the EU is a more important issue than a Labour Government in the U.K.
beorhthelm
A. Virgo, Football Genius
- Jul 21, 2003
- 35,315
what reason is that? no one has to publish their tax returns. whats happened here is a pointless stunt by Corbyn has backfired because someone has cocked up, and just shows the incompetance in his office.
whats comical is he and the Momentum minions then go off blaming the media and even the Cabinet Office for his cockup. they cant even manage the simple message that its not "missing" but is infact on page 3 under "public office". though maybe thats because its a ruse, as thats for £27,192 when he's entitled to £39,272, and doesnt explain why its not included in the Total Income or missing from the tax deductions. only people to blame is himself, his advisors and his accountant.
Last edited:
glasfryn
cleaning up cat sick
nice piece of fake news there H/G
London Irish
Well-known member
**** sake - what?
There was nothing wrong with his form, which is why the bent media had to change their story 3 times! Fair play to those outlets who saw it was shite reporting by the racist scumbag site Guido in the first place.
Yes - politicians do have to publish their tax returns because we need maximum transparancy from those who put themselves forward to run the country's financial affairs.
Which is why May has published hers - and of course such is the Tory bungling she didn't realise she'd put Hammond in the shite because he wants to hide something in his. Probably full of tax avoiding bollocks that wouldn't exactly go down well with the "we're all in this together" PR spin - still, plenty of time before the election before we can uncover what Hammond is up to.
About 26k less than last month?
glasfryn
cleaning up cat sick
still more than the tories will ever have
beorhthelm
A. Virgo, Football Genius
- Jul 21, 2003
- 35,315
you should tell the Guardian who only yesterday asked the question, should MPs follow Corbyn's example
and the tax return published is wrong, kudos for him for publishing, but its clearly wrong as the total income and tax paid on page 1 are missing the amounts from page 3. no spin, no media, its plain as day when you look at them.
JC Footy Genius
Bringer of TRUTH
- Jun 9, 2015
- 10,568
**** sake - what?
There was nothing wrong with his form, which is why the bent media had to change their story 3 times! Fair play to those outlets who saw it was shite reporting by the racist scumbag site Guido in the first place.
Yes - politicians do have to publish their tax returns because we need maximum transparancy from those who put themselves forward to run the country's financial affairs.
Which is why May has published hers - and of course such is the Tory bungling she didn't realise she'd put Hammond in the shite because he wants to hide something in his. Probably full of tax avoiding bollocks that wouldn't exactly go down well with the "we're all in this together" PR spin - still, plenty of time before the election before we can uncover what Hammond is up to.
They probably had to change it numerous times because they kept getting innacurate information from his devoted delusional minions.
A Labour source was initially unable to say why Mr Corbyn's leader's salary appeared to be missing from the return, which was prepared by accountants.
But later a Labour spokesman said it was "untrue" the leadership payment had been omitted, saying it was included in the full return under the heading of "public office".
The party later clarified the payment was included under the pension and benefits income because it was not counted as part of his salary. - BBC
All very Corbynesque
Some of the towering intellects on NSC (Ernest/HT) have jumped ship .. I see others are following.
'I regard Corbyn as a disaster' - Stephen Hawking
https://order-order.com/2017/03/07/stephen-hawking-corbyn/
On a national electoral scale membership figures are completely meaningless, its just willy waving. Of course, internally for the Labour party the membership figures are massive because cocnsisting as they do of ageing lefties and students who don't know any better they currently ensure the meaningless (electorally) but continual re-selection of Corbyn as puppet leader.
**** sake - what?
There was nothing wrong with his form, which is why the bent media had to change their story 3 times! Fair play to those outlets who saw it was shite reporting by the racist scumbag site Guido in the first place.
Yes - politicians do have to publish their tax returns because we need maximum transparancy from those who put themselves forward to run the country's financial affairs.
Which is why May has published hers - and of course such is the Tory bungling she didn't realise she'd put Hammond in the shite because he wants to hide something in his. Probably full of tax avoiding bollocks that wouldn't exactly go down well with the "we're all in this together" PR spin - still, plenty of time before the election before we can uncover what Hammond is up to.
Castlemead etc...
There you go...
https://order-order.com/2017/03/07/hammond-transferred-shares-and-property-assets-to-his-wife/
alfredmizen
Banned
- Mar 11, 2015
- 6,342
So the election is decided on the size of party membership now ?
London Irish
Well-known member
They probably had to change it numerous times because they kept getting innacurate information from his devoted delusional minions.
A Labour source was initially unable to say why Mr Corbyn's leader's salary appeared to be missing from the return, which was prepared by accountants.
But later a Labour spokesman said it was "untrue" the leadership payment had been omitted, saying it was included in the full return under the heading of "public office".
The party later clarified the payment was included under the pension and benefits income because it was not counted as part of his salary. - BBC
All very Corbynesque
Some of the towering intellects on NSC (Ernest/HT) have jumped ship .. I see others are following.
'I regard Corbyn as a disaster' - Stephen Hawking
https://order-order.com/2017/03/07/stephen-hawking-corbyn/
Here's a Tory using the racist website Guido again to back up his arguments. If you don't believe me, just go into the comments section of any Guido story and it's full of racist garbage
GT49er
Well-known member
Well yes - except that ageing lefties and students who don't know any better are hardly likely to support him now that he has decided to support Brexit! But, as someone has suggested, maybe these are the ones now leaving the Labour Party.
Far be it for me to defend a Tory but that is just sensible tax planning and something we would suggest any client should do.
cheshunt seagull
Well-known member
- Jul 5, 2003
- 2,498
This ageing leftie did leave for this reason although it was more the last straw than the whole reason. However there are many who fit this description who were never keen on the EU to begin with but not because they have any issues at all with freedom of movement but because they saw it as a capitalist cartel.