'Multi year' deal............
http://www.seagulls.co.uk/news/arti...ce-new-kit-partnership-with-nike-1432659.aspx
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Kit announcement date and time being announced at 4:30
- Thread starter Chinman3000
- Start date
'Multi year' deal............
http://www.seagulls.co.uk/news/arti...ce-new-kit-partnership-with-nike-1432659.aspx
Barry Izbak
U.T.A.
I was planning to buy a new home shirt this season - haven't had one since Amex Season One
But as others have said, the sticker on the front rules it out I'm afraid. Looks cheap. And at forty five quid it ain't.
But as others have said, the sticker on the front rules it out I'm afraid. Looks cheap. And at forty five quid it ain't.
Hmm. Pure speculation and hope, but if this is a one-year kit I wonder if that's purely because even the club are fed up with the stick-on sponsor panel and want to move as soon as possible? 3 years doesn't seem entirely unreasonable for an agreement, this being the third?
KingstonSeagull
New member
Ninja Elephant
Doctor Elephant
- Feb 16, 2009
- 18,855
Like others, I won't be buying the home shirt again because of the iron on panel. It looks rubbish, cheap and tacky. Not things I'd choose to associate either with the Albion, or with the company advertised in the panel.
The away shirt is very dapper so that will be bought after the first game when Jiri Skalak's number can't be changed.
The away shirt is very dapper so that will be bought after the first game when Jiri Skalak's number can't be changed.
Spot on, I really like the away shirt. Much better.
Not Andy Naylor
Well-known member
It's Brighton from in front, Bury FC from behind. If, as they claim, it's based on the Peter Ward kit, then surely they could have a white patch for the numbers.
Raphael Meade
Well-known member
Genuinely shocked that a club at this level isn't able to figure out anything better than a stick on sponsor panel that looks that bad. Can't quite believe.
British Bulldog
The great escape
- Feb 6, 2006
- 10,897
Like the front but not so the back.
Tony Meolas Loan Spell
Slut Faced Whores
TWOCHOICEStom
Well-known member
Branding guidelines.
TWOCHOICEStom
Well-known member
Jimmy Grimble
Well-known member
And why the tick on the shorts isn't red to keep it consistent?
I never buy club shirts so I'm not overly bothered, I just like to have a kit that looks decent and represents us well on TV, etc.
SweatyMexican
Well-known member
- Mar 31, 2013
- 4,101
A red Nike tick? 
Ironed on sponser, again?
Apart from that, it's okay I guess.
Ironed on sponser, again?
Apart from that, it's okay I guess.
Cold Gettin Dumb
Active member
- Jan 31, 2013
- 462
I think the front is nice, bar the red nike tick...
The back just doesn't look right. AT least its not as bad as the back of the other season's red and black striped kit. That one looked like you were wearing a short waistcoat when viewed from the back...
The back just doesn't look right. AT least its not as bad as the back of the other season's red and black striped kit. That one looked like you were wearing a short waistcoat when viewed from the back...
BensGrandad
New member
It has to be remembered that these shirts are probably made in a Far East sweat shop at about £2.50 a throw so there is a limit to what you can do with the material at that price. I am past buying team shirts but I would have preferred the blue and white striped back with a large white patch and the numbers in red.
Easy 10
Brain dead MUG SHEEP
Front is ok I suppose, I don't really notice the tacky iron-on nature of the sponsor from the stands. The back is proper shit though. It's like we're wearing 2 different kits, it just doesn't match up or look right. That will irritate me all season long.
Oh well. Only for a year I suppose. I never buy them anyway.
Oh well. Only for a year I suppose. I never buy them anyway.
Nixonator
Well-known member
To be fair there are a few:
- Stripe colours reversed
- Stripes continue on sleeves
- White reverse
- Lighter blue?
- Red name/number
- Red tick
- Blue collar