Winning a game of football without Kayal and Stephens

[Blue Valkyrie]

Haven't seen much sign of Towell being anywhere near consideration for the first XI either. The forgotten man of the squad, it seems. And as for only having Stephens, Sidwell, Norwood and Ince (and I agree that Ince isn't up to it) we only ever play two CMs at once.

Hughton states in argus recently that Towell is "definately a player we like".

For sure we won't loan him out when Kayal is crocked.

 

[S'hampton Seagull]

Haven't seen much sign of Towell being anywhere near consideration for the first XI either. The forgotten man of the squad, it seems. And as for only having Stephens, Sidwell, Norwood and Ince (and I agree that Ince isn't up to it) we only ever play two CMs at once.

If fit I think Towell is ahead of Ince in the pecking order. Given that, if we are missing Kayal for any length of time what would be the point of weakening the squad further by loaning out Towell? Especially given it means Ince might need to play.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

 

[GT49er]

If fit I think Towell is ahead of Ince in the pecking order.

Well, I'm not at all sure that is the case. Still, it is down to what CH thinks in the end, and it certainly won't be decided on NSC!