Just looking at some stats for last season and this. Last season we conceded 62 goals. This season, so far, it’s 58. So you’d hope an on beach Spuds won’t take us over last season (I can hear you thinking “you’ve done it now”).
So, at first glance, FH has bettered RDZ on another stat. However, last season a lot of teams conceded a lot of goals. West Ham finished 2 places above us and conceded 74. Our defensive record was 10th best and Villa and Spurs in fourth and fifth conceded just one goal less with 61.
This season our defensive record is 14th best and Man Utd have actually conceded fewer than us. The teams in fourth and fifth have conceded 43 and 49 respectively.
Is this a sign of defensive, hit on the break, football like Forest (and Palace in the Cup Final) have played slowly working out possession football? Is it just the utter toothlessness of the bottom three? A mix of both?
Is being less exposed on the break our pre season homework or does it bring sufficient rewards attacking wise to stick how we are?
So, at first glance, FH has bettered RDZ on another stat. However, last season a lot of teams conceded a lot of goals. West Ham finished 2 places above us and conceded 74. Our defensive record was 10th best and Villa and Spurs in fourth and fifth conceded just one goal less with 61.
This season our defensive record is 14th best and Man Utd have actually conceded fewer than us. The teams in fourth and fifth have conceded 43 and 49 respectively.
Is this a sign of defensive, hit on the break, football like Forest (and Palace in the Cup Final) have played slowly working out possession football? Is it just the utter toothlessness of the bottom three? A mix of both?
Is being less exposed on the break our pre season homework or does it bring sufficient rewards attacking wise to stick how we are?