Is that they will see waterhall as the best site, to be honest it is
what happens if this is put forward to fatman
what happens if this is put forward to fatman
thankspishhead said:not viable due to access and also the lack of a train station.
then we'll build it there won't wekinkygerbil said:yes but what happens if another site is found?
pishhead said:not viable due to access and also the lack of a train station.
i for one(being a local resident) know that the lot round here will have loads of room to object(as they were told it would only be temporary)bobbycodpiece said:Why not re-develop Withdean....the site's big enough ?
bobbycodpiece said:Why not re-develop Withdean....the site's big enough ?
bobbycodpiece said:Why not re-develop Withdean....the site's big enough ?
beorhthelm said:unfortunatly they are both issues that could be solved by enough money and therefore sort of dont count.
The fact that its also in an AONB is more relevant though. flip side to that is that there is already a sports ground there, so you could argue that the use of the ground is already for sports and recreation.
Anyone want to nurture a colony of extremly rare frogs/bat/wild flowers there to finally kill it off? [/QUOTE
Its a filled in rubbish dump like Sheepcote how can it be aonb ?
exactly-Captain Sensible said:Waterhall cannot be used mainly because of its location and because a rail link cannot be implemented, meaining all travel to it would be by car. It could not happen. Don't let it worry you!