Brighton born & bred
- Oct 20, 2022
No - you did NOT for the 3rd time - You weren’t just disagreeing with me, you were deliberately twisting what I was saying, adding presumptive comments then trying to be clever by trying to catch me out even when I had explained to you my initial comment TWICE you then accused me of deliberately offending you - please read my first and subsequent posts again and your responses. You have now done it again!I may disagree with a poster although I never try to insult them or their intelligence for a cheap shot. I didn’t insult you I simply stated what you posted.
If you have to result to insults trying to make a point then you’ve already lost in my book.
For your information- I did not insult you, I have NOT insulted anyone here, I stated a fact - being ‘ignorant’ of something in particular is not an insult on someone’s intelligence - it means having having no knowledge of (in this context) jurisprudence legal principles- you (rather aggressively!) asked me what I believed asked me a question and I answered you - I translated the latin and meaning because I assumed you would have no knowledge of legal jurisprudential principles - If I was incorrect in assuming you were ignorant of this principle, I used, I apologise- most people would be, unless, like me, they have a background in law.
Another legal principle is ignorantia juris non excusat - you can translate that one yourself, I don’t want to risk insulting you.
I’m done here.