[Football] Touching-up v Snowflakes

[Leekbrookgull]

Grt Ormand St.Keep every penny. Its a Male only event no different from Womens only event.

 

[studio150]

Grt Ormand St.Keep every penny. Its a Male only event no different from Womens only event.

The world has moved on from your views

 

[Brian Parsons]

From what I've read in the media and heard on radio they were " professional escorts" or members of the oldest profession in the world put another way. G.O.S.H. should keep the money.

Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk

 

[Stat Brother]

I do have to give credit to the Labour MP, with an interesting line of necklace, when she said words to the effect of:-

'this has been reported as the most salacious event of the year'

 

[LlcoolJ]

From what I've read in the media and heard on radio they were " professional escorts" or members of the oldest profession in the world put another way. G.O.S.H. should keep the money.

Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk

You need to read the original FT article then because that is utter horseshit.

https://www.ft.com/content/075d679e-0033-11e8-9650-9c0ad2d7c5b5

 

[DavidinSouthampton]

From what I've read in the media and heard on radio they were " professional escorts" or members of the oldest profession in the world put another way. G.O.S.H. should keep the money.

Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk

That's why one of the women reporting she had been groped is a reporter on the Financial Times, then.

 

[Stat Brother]

A Men only evening with a 'no groping' policy written into the programme was never going to end well.

 

[marlowe]

The whole thing was disgusting. Sexual harassment in the name of charity. The girls were made to sign confidentiality agreements as part of the condition of their employment for the event. This gave the male guests more of a licence to behave inappropriately towards the women. While some of the women might have been prepared to tolerate the behaviour a lot of them weren't.

 

[mothy]

The whole thing was disgusting. Sexual harassment in the name of charity. The girls were made to sign confidentiality agreements as part of the condition of their employment for the event. This gave the male guests more of a licence to behave inappropriately towards the women. While some of the women might have been prepared to tolerate the behaviour a lot of them weren't.

Were you there? & were they fit?

Also. It was for charity mate

 

[dingodan]

That's why one of the women reporting she had been groped is a reporter on the Financial Times, then.

I got the impression she took the job for the night as a way of "undercover reporting", i.e. she was after the story.

I'd like to hear from those women who actually took that work honestly, knowing what they were doing, not the journalists who crashed it so they could get offended.

I hope everyone is just as outraged for these guys and wants to see these women publicly shamed and lose their jobs too, and if not, why not?

 

[mothy]

I got the impression she took the job for the night as a way of "undercover reporting", i.e. she was after the story.

I'd like to hear from those women who actually took that work honestly, knowing what they were doing, not the journalists who crashed it so the could get offended.

I hope everyone is just as outraged for these guys and wants to see these women publicly shamed and lose their jobs too, and if not, why not?

Disgusting!

 

[LlcoolJ]

I got the impression she took the job for the night as a way of "undercover reporting", i.e. she was after the story.

I'd like to hear from those women who actually took that work honestly, knowing what they were doing, not the journalists who crashed it so they could get offended.

I hope everyone is just as outraged for these guys and wants to see these women publicly shamed and lose their jobs too, and if not, why not?

Read the article then FFS.

Bit strange that you're surfing sites like "hunkybutlerservice" btw but each to their own........

 

[marlowe]

I got the impression she took the job for the night as a way of "undercover reporting", i.e. she was after the story.

I'd like to hear from those women who actually took that work honestly, knowing what they were doing, not the journalists who crashed it so they could get offended.

I hope everyone is just as outraged for these guys and wants to see these women publicly shamed and lose their jobs too, and if not, why not?

Everyone looks perfectly consenting in those photos. A half naked consenting female being ogled and groped by a group of men would be equally acceptable. It is when the groping is not consensual when it becomes unacceptable whether the person being groped is male or female. However in the case of non consenting women they are more likely to feel threatened and vulnerable and intimidated by the situation whereas a man is more able to defend himself in such a situation.

 

[DavidinSouthampton]

Were you there? & were they fit?

Also. It was for charity mate

Does "It was for Charity" serve as an excuse for doing the unacceptable these days?

 

[nicko31]

Sounds like a pretty dull evening TBH

 

[Leekbrookgull]

I got the impression she took the job for the night as a way of "undercover reporting", i.e. she was after the story.

I'd like to hear from those women who actually took that work honestly, knowing what they were doing, not the journalists who crashed it so they could get offended.

I hope everyone is just as outraged for these guys and wants to see these women publicly shamed and lose their jobs too, and if not, why not?

I don;t think the SNOWFLAKES will agree with you !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[GT49er]

I think it's disgraceful the way women recruit and organise the girls for events such as these. It seems that it's some women that need to be put right on what's acceptable too, not just the enemy - sorry, men.. And, just for the record, I am not approving of the behaviour of the men at this event.

 

[Cheshire Cat]

I don't think you are comparing the same things.

Consenting adults v assaults on waitresses

 

[dazzer6666]

I got the impression she took the job for the night as a way of "undercover reporting", i.e. she was after the story.

I'd like to hear from those women who actually took that work honestly, knowing what they were doing, not the journalists who crashed it so they could get offended.

I hope everyone is just as outraged for these guys and wants to see these women publicly shamed and lose their jobs too, and if not, why not?

One of the FT reporters was speaking on BBC News at lunchtime - pretty sure that’s exactly what she did - the BBC news clip had film of her getting ready beforehand etc. From what she said, she had some exposure to it herself (the handholding for example) but not as much as she was saying she heard from others who were working there.

Bunch of drunken oafs get a bit out of order, organisers very guilty of basically setting things up in such a way as that was always the likely outcome (pissed up, slightly desperate middle aged all male customers.....young, tall, attractive, provocatively dressed waitresses.....it’s hardly rocket science). Sure there were a number of the staff who knew exactly how things would pan out (not that that makes it right).

 

[Thunder Bolt]

Were you there? & were they fit?

Also. It was for charity mate

Women have to be fit to be waitresses?

Jimmy Savile did it for charity too.