Welcome to North Stand Chat - the biggest and best Brighton & Hove Albion fan site.

We'd love you to join our community - hit that "Register" button now!

Shopping at via this link helps to support NSC

[Politics] Tory meltdown finally arrived [was: incoming]...

Twas ever thus (maybe a bit worse under New Labour) ..

52E035F3-93BA-4DEA-B81D-552AF48531A0.jpeg
 


Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
Oct 8, 2003
41,454
Faversham
Apparently hopeless secretary, Sue Ellen Braverman is in Rwanda right now, looking at arrangements for the deportation gambit.

The BBC also stated minutes ago that nobody has been sent there yet owing to legal challenges.

What the f***? Why can't a government minister get anything done. Shitehouse. Get Rid!
 

jcdenton08

PROD with the PROD
Oct 17, 2008
7,077
Apparently hopeless secretary, Sue Ellen Braverman is in Rwanda right now, looking at arrangements for the deportation gambit.
The BBC also stated minutes ago that nobody has been sent there yet owing to legal challenges.

What the f***? Why can't a government minister get anything done. Shitehouse. Get Rid!
Mental. Absolute disgrace. I strongly suspect they have no plans where they are planning on sending these unfortunate people to or the quality of their care once there. They’re paying to get rid and it becomes someone else’s problem. It’s shameful.
 

Hugo Rune

Members
Feb 23, 2012
18,549
Brighton
Really thought he was going back to Henley. Will do well to hang on, awful MP

He might be fighting for his seat sooner than the next election.

 


chickens

Intending to survive this time of asset strippers
Oct 12, 2022
478
The DUP and ERG have rejected Sunaks deal on the NI issue.

The civil war will rumble on!

At this rate, Labour will be shaping the new agreement after the next general election. The ERG have been foolish here, their time of influence is, I very much suspect, drawing to a close.
 

Reddleman

Members
May 17, 2017
1,294
I am absolutely sick to death of the ERG and their ‘influence’ on British politics. If Sunak had anything about him he would impose a three line whip and anyone who voted against the bill loses the whip. The bill would still pass with Labour support and finally they could lance the boil. He won’t though.
 

Rdodge30

Active member
Dec 30, 2022
182
At this rate, Labour will be shaping the new agreement after the next general election. The ERG have been foolish here, their time of influence is, I very much suspect, drawing to a close.
Ridiculous sabotage from the ERG

However Labour will bring with them their own equivalent with the Socialist Campaign Group within their parliamentary party

And so it goes and so it goes
 


I misled you, but I did it in good faith. For once, Boris is telling the truth.

In his mind, "in good faith" will mean "honesty or sincerity of intention".

Effectively, he is saying "I misled you, and that was my honest and sincere intention".
Ignorance is no defence of the law.

Mistake or ignorance of law. Ignorance or mistake of law is no defence to a criminal charge; mens rea does not involve knowledge on the part of a defendant that his acts or omissions were against the law and constituted a crime1.
 

WATFORD zero

Members
Jul 10, 2003
22,491
I am absolutely sick to death of the ERG and their ‘influence’ on British politics. If Sunak had anything about him he would impose a three line whip and anyone who voted against the bill loses the whip. The bill would still pass with Labour support and finally they could lance the boil. He won’t though.
I agree the bill will pass anyway and about the ERG's ongoing idiocy, but what boil will replacing Johnson's 'Northern Ireland Protocol' with May's 'Northern Ireland backstop', now rebranded Sunak's 'Windsor Framework' lance exactly ? :shrug:
 

MJsGhost

Remembers
Jun 26, 2009
3,662
East
Ignorance is no defence of the law.

Mistake or ignorance of law. Ignorance or mistake of law is no defence to a criminal charge; mens rea does not involve knowledge on the part of a defendant that his acts or omissions were against the law and constituted a crime1.
Is this not about the parliamentary code of conduct rather than the law?

He's trying to say he didn't intentionally mislead the House, even though the investigation suggests that what he said was wrong.

Any sane person would look at the circumstances and decide that he knew enough AT THE TIME to know that the parties were against the rules and therefore he deliberately misled the House with his statements about them, but he has spent a sh|t-tonne of taxpayer's money on Lord Pannick to try and wheedle out on a technicality again.

Someone just needs to put the scruffy c**t in the bin, then in the sea, then on a slowboat to Rwanda
 

rippleman

Members
Oct 18, 2011
4,260
Is this not about the parliamentary code of conduct rather than the law?

He's trying to say he didn't intentionally mislead the House, even though the investigation suggests that what he said was wrong.

Any sane person would look at the circumstances and decide that he knew enough AT THE TIME to know that the parties were against the rules and therefore he deliberately misled the House with his statements about them, but he has spent a sh|t-tonne of taxpayer's money on Lord Pannick to try and wheedle out on a technicality again.

Someone just needs to put the scruffy c**t in the bin, then in the sea, then on a slowboat to Rwanda
Is that before or after he has been ploughed into The Clamp's ditch?
 
Is this not about the parliamentary code of conduct rather than the law?

He's trying to say he didn't intentionally mislead the House, even though the investigation suggests that what he said was wrong.

Any sane person would look at the circumstances and decide that he knew enough AT THE TIME to know that the parties were against the rules and therefore he deliberately misled the House with his statements about them, but he has spent a sh|t-tonne of taxpayer's money on Lord Pannick to try and wheedle out on a technicality again.

Someone just needs to put the scruffy c**t in the bin, then in the sea, then on a slowboat to Rwanda
He's saying nobody told him it was wrong, or that is the way I have read it.
 

Paying the bills

Latest Discussions

Paying the bills

Paying the bills

Paying the bills

Top