This wont help the sausage jockeys who want to adopt!

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊











Barrel of Fun

Abort, retry, fail
Welcome back Looney.

A despicable sentence. The laws must be changed. If you plead guilty you should serve the same sentence, if you do not plead guilty then you should have a third added on....at least!

No parole either!
 


looney

Banned
Jul 7, 2003
15,652
The problem for pedo's is that eventually kids grow up and sometimes grass them up.

So they are likley to focus on Short term foster care as it gives them a regular churn of fresh young meat, Dont know how long the Government has legalised child abuse but they were convicted of abusing 4 boys. No doubt that record will easily be broken.

Oh and as for "back", not really, had enough of messageboards so going into blogging. May post occaisionally, but got other things to do.
 
Last edited:




Schrödinger's Toad

Nie dla Idiotów
Jan 21, 2004
11,957
BarrelofFun said:
A despicable sentence. The laws must be changed. If you plead guilty you should serve the same sentence, if you do not plead guilty then you should have a third added on....at least!

I concur.

Similar to the equally offensive notion of being let out early for "good behaviour" (i.e. hasn't started any riots). A sentence should be served in its entireity; any adjustments should be additions on top of that. The "punishment" aspect of jail seems to have been forgotten.
 


Gwylan

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
32,236
Uffern
Cost of supporting the current prison population for a year is approx £2.4bn. We'd have to pay for that but on top of that, we'd have to pay for more prisons to be built; let's say around £3bn - that's about £1000 per tax payer every year (and that's not taking into account people getting longer sentences, just serving their full term).

I wouldn't mind betting that the people who shout loudest about people serving the full term of their sentences would also be the people who shout loudest about about their taxes going up.
 


chicken run said:
Bogey,you know you're gonna be in trouble now with all the lefty elite on here," what these people need is not longer prison sentances,they need our understanding,we need to try and work with them,proove we still trust them with kids,let them look after some more vulnerable boys,give them leather chairs,it's facists and nazis like you bogey that bring out all the racists and gay bashers "
 




pasty

A different kind of pasty
Jul 5, 2003
31,745
West, West, West Sussex
Gwylan said:
Cost of supporting the current prison population for a year is approx £2.4bn. We'd have to pay for that but on top of that, we'd have to pay for more prisons to be built; let's say around £3bn - that's about £1000 per tax payer every year (and that's not taking into account people getting longer sentences, just serving their full term).

I wouldn't mind betting that the people who shout loudest about people serving the full term of their sentences would also be the people who shout loudest about about their taxes going up.

Not at all. If my taxes went up but, but kept guilty criminals in prison where they belong, that would be fine with me.

What actually needs addressing is these idiotic judges who hand down sentances that have no reflection on the seriousness of the crime.
 


DJ Leon

New member
Aug 30, 2003
3,446
Hassocks
pasty said:
Not at all. If my taxes went up but, but kept guilty criminals in prison where they belong, that would be fine with me.

What actually needs addressing is these idiotic judges who hand down sentances that have no reflection on the seriousness of the crime.

Th judges are sentencing within given frameworks. It's not really their fault.
 


DJ Leon said:
Th judges are sentencing within given frameworks. It's not really their fault.
The judges are handing out pathetic sentences because half the old c*nts are at it.as for more taxes to pay for more prisons,there is no need,use the dirty bastards instead of monkeys and rats for medical experimentation,put the scumbags in cages .
 




pasty

A different kind of pasty
Jul 5, 2003
31,745
West, West, West Sussex
DJ Leon said:
Th judges are sentencing within given frameworks. It's not really their fault.

Fair enough - I didn't realise that. In which case, the frameworks, and those that set them should be reviewed.
 


Bakesy

Farting for ENGLAND!!!
Feb 13, 2005
9,667
How would i know?I'm pissed.
BarrelofFun said:
Welcome back Looney.

A despicable sentence. The laws must be changed. If you plead guilty you should serve the same sentence, if you do not plead guilty then you should have a third added on....at least!

No parole either!
Cut their f***ing bollocks off.....:angry: :angry:
 






Woodchip

It's all about the bikes
Aug 28, 2004
14,460
Shaky Town, NZ
Gwylan said:
Cost of supporting the current prison population for a year is approx £2.4bn. We'd have to pay for that but on top of that, we'd have to pay for more prisons to be built; let's say around £3bn - that's about £1000 per tax payer every year (and that's not taking into account people getting longer sentences, just serving their full term).

I wouldn't mind betting that the people who shout loudest about people serving the full term of their sentences would also be the people who shout loudest about about their taxes going up.
Alternatively, those lazy arse politicians could stop paying themselves so much! That would save millions.
 


Gwylan

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
32,236
Uffern
pasty said:
Not at all. If my taxes went up but, but kept guilty criminals in prison where they belong, that would be fine with me.

It might be with you but you'd be in a minority.

People in the 80s consistently said they would support higher taxes for public services but then voted against the proposal when given the chance.
 




looney

Banned
Jul 7, 2003
15,652
Build more prisons, taxes go up, crime goes down, insurance and security costs go down, repairing damage and graffitti costs go down, privatise prisons taxes go down.

Investment in lower crime ridden areas goes up, unemployment goes down, crime goes down. Quality of life goes up, Policing becomes more focused and crime falls or fewer police needed so taxes go down again.


Who suffers other than criminals?
 




looney said:
Build more prisons, taxes go up, crime goes down, insurance and security costs go down, repairing damage and graffitti costs go down, privatise prisons taxes go down.

Investment in lower crime ridden areas goes up, unemployment goes down, crime goes down. Quality of life goes up, Policing becomes more focused and crime falls or fewer police needed so taxes go down again.


Who suffers other than criminals?
:clap: :clap: :clap:
 


Chicken Run

Member Since Jul 2003
NSC Patron
Jul 17, 2003
21,051
looney said:
Build more prisons, taxes go up, crime goes down, insurance and security costs go down, repairing damage and graffitti costs go down, privatise prisons taxes go down.

Investment in lower crime ridden areas goes up, unemployment goes down, crime goes down. Quality of life goes up, Policing becomes more focused and crime falls or fewer police needed so taxes go down again.



:clap: Post of the day
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top