- Aug 8, 2005
- 27,795
The media seem to have largely ignored the differences in cases and deaths throughout the regions and how different they are from area to area, and more importantly perhaps so has the Government. In England there is a massive difference between what has happened in London and then also in the Midland compared to down here and areas further away from the big cities.
In most parts of London 40-50% of all deaths since end of Feb have been Covid-19 related. Birmingham 32%
In West Sussex it is 16%, East Sussex 14%, Devon 9%, Cornwall 11%.
Surely this sort of regionally disparity should be reflected in the way that the lockdown measures are eased? Seems mad to allow London to go back to work in exactly the same way as Devon for example.
I see Andy Burnham made this point earlier in the week about the North West https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p08cv8p7, with Manchester at 26% and Liverpool at 32%. Surely large cities should be treated differently to more rural areas?
In most parts of London 40-50% of all deaths since end of Feb have been Covid-19 related. Birmingham 32%
In West Sussex it is 16%, East Sussex 14%, Devon 9%, Cornwall 11%.
Surely this sort of regionally disparity should be reflected in the way that the lockdown measures are eased? Seems mad to allow London to go back to work in exactly the same way as Devon for example.
I see Andy Burnham made this point earlier in the week about the North West https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p08cv8p7, with Manchester at 26% and Liverpool at 32%. Surely large cities should be treated differently to more rural areas?