Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Sven Tonight



Kinky Gerbil

Im The Scatman
NSC Patron
Jul 16, 2003
59,241
hassocks
One plus point - He change the game for the better again with bringing on Gerrard

One minus point - what is the point of resting players on a yellow card then bringing both on?
 




algie

The moaning of life
Jan 8, 2006
14,713
In rehab
He had no choice
 




I liked our midfield today until the second half, where Cole seem to go missing.

We had that great passing movement let down by Ashlley Cole inability to trap a ball, we never tried it again which was a shame!
 




Easy 10

Brain dead MUG SHEEP
Jul 5, 2003
62,831
Location Location
Well after that, if the penny hasn't dropped with Sven about the need for a holding midfielder, then it never f***ing will. That 1st half was superb, with a capital SOO. Swedes had nothing to lose in the 2nd and so piled forward accordingly, although all their threats were from set pieces. Hargreaves did everything that was askewd of him, and although I'd still prefer Carrick for his superior range of passing, the system Sven played just worked so much better.

It HAS to be the way forward.
 




goldstone

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 5, 2003
7,268
And what's the point of only bringing four strikers and then not playing one of them???

The bloke's mad.
 




Bakesy

Farting for ENGLAND!!!
Feb 13, 2005
9,667
How would i know?I'm pissed.
goldstone said:
And what's the point of only bringing four strikers and then not playing one of them???

The bloke's mad.
Yep, Sven was greedy.........it's obvious he should have only brought 3, freeing up a space for Robert Green, after all, you don't need to be fit to go to the World Cup.
 








1

1066gull

Guest
brightonfan_86 said:
Beckham in the middle with Gerrard, Lennon on the right.
You cannot move Beckham out of the position. The whole team are use to his set up of play from there.

I actually think we can work with 451 as ive been a pro 442 supporter.
 




Schrödinger's Toad

Nie dla Idiotów
Jan 21, 2004
11,957
Easy 10 said:
Well after that, if the penny hasn't dropped with Sven about the need for a holding midfielder, then it never f***ing will. That 1st half was superb, with a capital SOO. Swedes had nothing to lose in the 2nd and so piled forward accordingly, although all their threats were from set pieces. Hargreaves did everything that was askewd of him, and although I'd still prefer Carrick for his superior range of passing, the system Sven played just worked so much better.

It HAS to be the way forward.

gvce26 said:
Lampard or Gerrad has to go = simple decision to make for the good of the side.

Exactly x 2. Yet you just know it'll be Gerrard and Lampard in the middle again, we'll be shit again, and he'll sit there scratching his head unable to work out why. For a supposedly intelligent man, he can certainly be pretty thick.
 




Schrödinger's Toad

Nie dla Idiotów
Jan 21, 2004
11,957
brightonfan_86 said:
Beckham in the middle with Gerrard, Lennon on the right.

Doesn't give you the holding midfielder we need though, does it? Big fan of Lennon though I am, he probably doesn't fit in at present.
 


Easy 10

Brain dead MUG SHEEP
Jul 5, 2003
62,831
Location Location
Repugnant Toad said:
Exactly x 2. Yet you just know it'll be Gerrard and Lampard in the middle again, we'll be shit again, and he'll sit there scratching his head unable to work out why. For a supposedly intelligent man, he can certainly be pretty thick.
Lampard/Gerrard can only be accommodated if he plays 4-1-4-1, which means Carrick or Hargreaves holding, Rooney as the lone striker, supported by Lampard/Gerrard/Joe Cole breaking beyond him.
 


Wardy

NSC's Benefits Guru
Oct 9, 2003
11,219
In front of the PC
goldstone said:
And what's the point of only bringing four strikers and then not playing one of them???

The bloke's mad.

He didn't bring 4 strikers. He brought 3 and some kid on a YTS scheme.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here