Sussex v Glamorgan

[Knightsworld]

Glamorgan 9/0 (2.0/40 ov)

Sussex won the toss and elected to field first

 

[Lord Bracknell]

Rain stopped play after 2 overs.

 

[dougdeep]

What? Still sunny in Seaford.

 

[Everest]

Let's up sticks and move to Seaford then

 

[Lord Bracknell]

Now back on the field.

Glamorgan 35/1 off 7.4 overs

 

[Knightsworld]

Glamorgan 35/1 (7.4/40 ov)

 

[The Large One]

Stuart Law retired hurt for Lancs.

 

[Knightsworld]

Glamorgan 93/2 (19.5/40 ov)

 

[Lord Bracknell]

Now Glamorgan 117/2
(24.0 overs - out of the 34 they will be allowed)

 

[Cantona's Flying Dropkick]

Sussex 51/0 (8.3/33 ov)

 

[Happy Seagull]

Sussex win by 3 runs d/l

 

[Barrel of Fun]

I thought we still won by wickets, but not that it matters!

Great batting from MP. Nice morale boosting victory before the big day on Saturday.

 

[Happy Seagull]

Sussex: 161-0 ( 20.4 overs )
Glamorgan: 193-6 ( 33.0 overs )
Sussex beat Glamorgan by 3 runs (D/L)

This is from the BBC. Although the 1st time i looked at it, it had Sussex as 115-0 and having won. Now they say 161-0.

 

[Southover Street Seagull]

Have another look at the BBC we are still piling up runs, we haven't won by the D/L method!

 

[Cantona's Flying Dropkick]

Sussex 181/0 (22.4/33 ov)

 

[sams dad]

Sussex 194-0
Won by 10 wkts (or 3 runs )

 

[Cantona's Flying Dropkick]

Sussex 196/1 (24.4/33 ov)

 

[Marty McFly]

Sussex 194-0
Won by 10 wkts (or 3 runs )

Glamorgan 193/6 (33/33 ov)
Sussex 197/1 (25.0/33 ov)
Sussex won by 9 wickets

 

[sams dad]

Glamorgan 193/6 (33/33 ov)
Sussex 197/1 (25.0/33 ov)
Sussex won by 9 wickets

I'm never going to trust the BBC website again

 

[Marty McFly]

I'm never going to trust the BBC website again

I'm not totally sure this is right, they kept changine runs (back or forwards) and overs left, but one thing for sure is we lost a wicket. (I think)