Skintight Rugby Shirts - Rubbish Or What?

[Tom Hark Preston Park]

Watching the egg-chasing - purely for betting purposes y'understand. These new shirts have a life-expectancy of about twenty minutes. Probably less with a beer-belly.

Just say no, kidz...

 

[Yorkie]

The main reason they are so skin tight is that they can't be yanked and pulled about the way footballers are.

I agree they look naff

 

[Citrus]

They work.

 

[Biscuit]

Look shyte, work well.

 

[Wozza]

The main reason they are so skin tight is that they can't be yanked and pulled about the way footballers are.

Yeah, but there's no advantage when both sides are wearing them.

 

[Citrus]

If we wern't wearing them, we would be at a disadvantage. And when we play any team other than France or RSA, we have an advantage!

Come on England!

 

[Cheeky Monkey]

For such a tedious sport it's quite a revolutionary break from the Cotton Traders tradition you rugger fans have come to know and love.

 

[CAFC Matt]

Work well, look shite. Did anyone see the England player swapping his and it needed three people to get it off and then on again.

 

[Sam]

Work well, look shite. Did anyone see the England player swapping his and it needed three people to get it off and then on again.

happened about 3 times in the game, but the bloke your on about was Neil Back. the shirts do the job, but do look a bit silly. they work very well, and it has shown since they wore them that players such as Ben Cohen and Mike Tindall have scored from the opposition not being able to hold on to them! they also cost £70!

 

[the right footed denilson]

it deoenst work any better- u watch how many times the players still get grabbed by their shirts.