Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Should Blair have negotiated with Bigley's killers?

What was right to do?

  • Do whatever it took to get Bigley free.

    Votes: 4 14.3%
  • No negotiate with terrorists.

    Votes: 24 85.7%

  • Total voters
    28


Brighton Breezy

New member
Jul 5, 2003
19,439
Sussex
I have the upmost sympathy with the family of Ken Bigley. It must be an awful awful time for them.

I also have sympathy for Tony Blair. When it came down to it the media pretty much put the responsibility for Bigley's release at the door of Number 10.

My own personal oppinion is that Blair could not be seen to negotiate. If he did this then every single British citizen in Iraq would have been under even more of a threat then they already are. They would all have been a nice target for anyone wanting people freed or demands met. They would all have thought, "I know, lets kidnap a Brit and threaten to kill them.

As I said, it must have been terrible for Bigley and his family. I cannot imagine what they must be going through and hope to God I never experience it.

Whatever your views on the Iraq War, the British Government cannot be seen to negotiate with terrorists.

Lets not forget the real villain in this is the people who beheaded him, not Blair.
 




itszamora

Go Jazz Go
Sep 21, 2003
7,282
London
No. There was nothing to negotiate over as we had no women prisoners in Iraq anyway. Those kidnappers got the publicity they wanted and then had their fun by killing him - quite possibly to make people want negotiations next time around
 


Beach Hut

Brighton Bhuna Boy
Jul 5, 2003
72,663
Living In a Box
Richie Morris said:
Whatever your views on the Iraq War, the British Government cannot be seen to negotiate with terrorists.

So what is the difference between an Irish and an Iraqi terrorist ?

A terrorist is a terrorist no matter what.

There is only one answer as Blair has already negotiated with terrorists in Ireland.
 


Brighton Breezy

New member
Jul 5, 2003
19,439
Sussex
Blair does not negotiate with the Real IRA or the UVF and negotiating with terrorists over how to end things through peace talks is one thing. It is not the same as negotiating with them when they are holding you to ransom over the life of an innocent engineer.

If Bigley's killer want to enter peace talks Im sure Blair would listen.
 


Beach Hut

Brighton Bhuna Boy
Jul 5, 2003
72,663
Living In a Box
All the Irish Terrorists are aligned to political parties so by talking to the relevant party it's the same thing.
 




Brighton Breezy

New member
Jul 5, 2003
19,439
Sussex
The Real IRA is an extremist splinter group who left the IRA because the IRA sat down to talk peace with the unionists.

The Real IRA and the IRA are not alligned and actually do not have much time for each other at all.
 


Beach Hut

Brighton Bhuna Boy
Jul 5, 2003
72,663
Living In a Box
The IRA were responsible for many atrocities and have a political wing which have been part of the peace process.

There's no smoke without fire.
 


Terrace Dandy

Banned
Mar 19, 2004
689
Richie Morris said:
Whatever your views on the Iraq War, the British Government cannot be seen to negotiate with terrorists

But Mr Blair couldn't do enough to sit down at the table with the IRA and work out a peace deal that will never happen. How many innocent people have lost their lives due to the I.R.A.?
 




Brighton Breezy

New member
Jul 5, 2003
19,439
Sussex
Yes the IRA have a history of terrorism.

Now they have agreed to sit down and talk peace.

The people who held Bigley killed an innocent man in an attempt to get their demands met. They are not talking peace.

Once they do, Blair should listen. Not before. If we give in to their demands because of these acts, they will never move toward peaceful conclusions.
 


Beach Hut

Brighton Bhuna Boy
Jul 5, 2003
72,663
Living In a Box
So we just erase from our memories all the IRA atrocities and forget they ever happened ?

Not me I am afraid once you act in a certain lawless way you cannot then expect all to be forgotten.
 






Terrace Dandy

Banned
Mar 19, 2004
689
Richie Morris said:
Yes the IRA have a history of terrorism.

Now they have agreed to sit down and talk peace.

The people who held Bigley killed an innocent man in an attempt to get their demands met. They are not talking peace

So the I.R.A never killed innocent people then, Try telling that to the family's who lost babies, daughters, sons, etc., think they'll have a few words to say about that.

It's not the I.R.A who has agreed to sit down and talk peace, It's tony Blair, he waved the white flag.
 


CHAPPERS

DISCO SPENG
Jul 5, 2003
45,329
No he should not have done. The Irish situation is different, just as f***ed up but different.
 


Beach Hut

Brighton Bhuna Boy
Jul 5, 2003
72,663
Living In a Box
ChapmansThe Saviour said:
No he should not have done. The Irish situation is different, just as f***ed up but different.

Only different because there was no way out for terrorists and it had to stop so conveniently it happened - it had reached a stand-off.

Pointless killing people, pointless the cost of preventing terrorism.

The IRA basically got a get out clause.
 




Brighton Breezy

New member
Jul 5, 2003
19,439
Sussex
The Ireland situation, where the Government is trying to set out a long term peace through talks and compromise is far different to giving a terrorist whatever they want because they are threatening to kill someone.
 




Beach Hut said:
Only different because there was no way out for terrorists and it had to stop so conveniently it happened - it had reached a stand-off.

Pointless killing people, pointless the cost of preventing terrorism.

The IRA basically got a get out clause.

So that was a good thing, yes?

Or would you still prefer the war between the IRA and the British Army to be raging and the killing still to be a daily occurance? The vast majority of people in Northern Ireland voted for the peace agreements despite Paisley and the far right wing of Unionism.
 


Brighton Breezy

New member
Jul 5, 2003
19,439
Sussex
Exactly London Irish.

Its a good thing that Blair is sitting down to map out peace in Ireland and not letting the religious bigotry of people like Paisley to stop the normal people of Ireland from living the life they deserve, free of fear and sectarianism.
 




Beach Hut

Brighton Bhuna Boy
Jul 5, 2003
72,663
Living In a Box
London Irish said:
So that was a good thing, yes?

Or would you still prefer the war between the IRA and the British Army to be raging and the killing still to be a daily occurance? The vast majority of people in Northern Ireland voted for the peace agreements despite Paisley and the far right wing of Unionism.

I would never actively say that this was a "good thing".

The point is it had reached a stalemate and I suppose the problem then is who backs down first.

The IRA were running out of sympathy and the finances to keep going so needed a way out.

I am all for the peace process but basically the Government is negotiating with terrorist albeit ones that are inactive.
 


Lush said:
Leaving Ireland aside, if you negotiate with terrorists, you encourage hostage taking.

God knows what Italy were playing at.

Would you really have the courage to say that to the faces of the parents of the two Italian girls who were freed? Or come to that, to the Bigleys who saw their father killed?

It may have been impossible to save Bigley, we'll never know because Blair didn't try, the Irish government in issuing him a passport did more than his own government. But there is a very simple way to stop British people being killed in Iraq - do as the Spanish did, and withdraw from an illegal invasion and hand Bush's mess over to a legitimate body like the UN. The UN might have some chance of isolating Bigley's killers from the broad anti-occupation insurgency that most Iraqis support.
 
Last edited:


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here