nickbrighton
Well-known member
- Feb 19, 2016
- 1,923
Chelsea pay best part of £100 million for Lukaku, and then for whatever do not play him. Lukaku isn't overly happy and Sky have an interview where he expresses that, and basically the fact that he wants to go back to Italy and indeed would have preferred to have stayed there in the first place
Sky then sit on the interview for best part of a month until Lukaku is in the team, and scoring goials.
Then they release the interview and create all kinds of trouble and Lukaku is dropped against Liverpool
So rather than reporting on their story when it occurred, which would have been the reasonable thing to do, they wait until the issues he raises look to have been resolved (at least he is starting and scoring) and then choose to release it purely to cause headlines and strife and create more of a story than there was
This seems to raise a few points, is it ethical (Sky -I know!),and more importantly, wtf didnt they do it the week before and then he may not have started against us!!
So is Sky just shit stirring for the greatest number of clicks, or are they genuinely reporting on a story in a timely fashion.
It seems to me that Lukaku is doing a bit of biting the hand that feeds him,but Sky are just stirring the pot when it suits them. Had they got the interview and reported on it at the time , I think it would have been fair game, but best part of a month later?
Sky then sit on the interview for best part of a month until Lukaku is in the team, and scoring goials.
Then they release the interview and create all kinds of trouble and Lukaku is dropped against Liverpool
So rather than reporting on their story when it occurred, which would have been the reasonable thing to do, they wait until the issues he raises look to have been resolved (at least he is starting and scoring) and then choose to release it purely to cause headlines and strife and create more of a story than there was
This seems to raise a few points, is it ethical (Sky -I know!),and more importantly, wtf didnt they do it the week before and then he may not have started against us!!
So is Sky just shit stirring for the greatest number of clicks, or are they genuinely reporting on a story in a timely fashion.
It seems to me that Lukaku is doing a bit of biting the hand that feeds him,but Sky are just stirring the pot when it suits them. Had they got the interview and reported on it at the time , I think it would have been fair game, but best part of a month later?
