North Stand Chat is a forum for fans of Brighton & Hove Albion Football Club. You can discuss Albion’s latest matches, the team and transfer news and rumours. Registration gives you access to all our forums and removes most of the adverts. You're here now, you might as well join us!

Shopping at via this link helps to support NSC

[Albion] Sanchez handball/red card?

Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports

brighton_tom

Members
Jul 23, 2008
3,801
Was clearly outside the box but clear also VAR didn't have an angle. Presumably they don't get every single camera which seems a bit odd..
The Bob we know and love. There's a big difference between calm and wreckless. Very lucky boy especially after being dropped.
In real time I thought it was out, but if you look over the images in this thread then it was probably just in. Just. Or at worst inconclusive. The image we have that looks straight down the line shows why VAR went with the decision it did.
 

Swansman

Pro-peace
May 13, 2019
22,320
Sweden
He wasn't outside the penalty box. That's the point.


That's not what the law says. The law says "The goalkeeper has the same restrictions on handling the ball as any other player outside the penalty area." it doesn't specify that where the ball is, is important (for situations like this, it would be quite helpful). It does, however, specify in multiple places, that the location of the goalkeeper is important.
Yes - same restrictions as any other player outside the penalty area: he's not allowed to handle it. You're not allowed to touch the ball with your hands outside the penalty area no matter where the rest of you are. If that was the case it would have been very easy for Rob Sanchez: he could have laid down, keeping his feet and perhaps legs in the area while getting his hands on the ball some 1.5 meters outside the box. But since that is very much not allowed, he tried to wait until the ball got into the box.

Similarly, if the goalie rushes out on a 1on1, gets lobbed and dives backwards to try to save the ball, it doesn't matter if his feet or body is outside the box as long as his hands are inside it.
 

Swansman

Pro-peace
May 13, 2019
22,320
Sweden
I think he’s trying too hard, trying to play RDZball at all costs. That situation today - any keeper thinking straight just clears it, he isn’t thinking straight.
RDZ put him on the bench for not playing RDZball... of course he'll try very hard.
 
Jul 7, 2003
12,222
tokyo
Maybe VAR used the same line as they did for Estupinan's goal against Palace?

Terrific wit aside, in real time watching on the beeb it looked like it was out/incredibly close to being out. The replays shown on t.v made it look in. The photo from behind play with the ball in the air make it look out but that's a terrible angle and shouldn't be trusted. Mitoma at the world cup should have taught us that much.
 

Lenny Rider

Well-known member
Sep 15, 2010
4,764
At Palace away the obvious VAR rickit changed the game, maybe this is all part of what Ron Atkinson used to say about it all even itself out over the season 🤷‍♂😂

No disrespect to Grimsby I still think we’d have beaten them with 10.
 

5Ways Gull

È quello che è
Feb 2, 2009
731
Fiveways, Brighton
He 100% picked the ball up outside the box, maybe a smidgen was on the line, it may not have been on the ground when he did so. The replay I saw did not freeze frame though, it was in real time.
In modern VAR influenced football a smidgen is a smidgen, so perfectly fair decision for me. Lots of goals these days disallowed due players being a smidgen offside. At the end of the day if we did get away with one I think we were due one.
 
Me neither. It’s like people want it to be the case that Sanchez should have got a red so that he can be called a liability.

The above freeze is from the in-line camera. The angle of the other cameras gives a misleading view.
I used a tennis photo to show that. This is in.
5CFEA125-45E2-4ADC-933B-ED176C428313.jpeg
 

Icy Gull

Back on the rollercoaster
Jul 5, 2003
70,287
In modern VAR influenced football a smidgen is a smidgen, so perfectly fair decision for me. Lots of goals these days disallowed due players being a smidgen offside. At the end of the day if we did get away with one I think we were due one.
True, just like our disallowed goal, that was also tight
 

heavysoul

Members
Aug 21, 2018
1,682
This is the Mitoma incident at the World Cup where he pulled the ball back - originally ruled out - but goal given by var. There was loads of analysis after as it was so important. Some angles gave false impression ball was way over the line … but it was proved that the ball overhung the line and goal was correctly awarded.


CF667DB5-EBE1-4E2C-AF5D-F62FD92B9009.jpeg
 

Paying the bills

Latest Discussions

Paying the bills

Paying the bills

Paying the bills


Top