Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Question Time



Beach Hut

Brighton Bhuna Boy
Jul 5, 2003
72,711
Living In a Box
And tonight the weasel Norman Baker is on..................

Also Nigel Farage who usually has plenty to say.
 






Blackadder

Brighton Bhuna Boy
Jul 6, 2003
16,145
Haywards Heath
Should be interesting next week when the BNP are on. No doubt some of NSC's finest will be watching Question Time for the first time ever!
 


Simster

"the man's an arse"
Jul 7, 2003
55,970
Surrey
Sorry, I know we didn't see eye to eye with him on Falmer, but he talks so much sense on virtually every other issue he comments on. Ugly fucker, but great politician.
 


Blackadder

Brighton Bhuna Boy
Jul 6, 2003
16,145
Haywards Heath
I concur with Simster. Apart from his anti-Falmer stance Baker does make sense. As does Vince Cable, and no, I'm not a Lib Dem!
 




coventrygull

the right one
Jun 3, 2004
6,752
Bridlington Yorkshire
Should be interesting next week when the BNP are on. No doubt some of NSC's finest will be watching Question Time for the first time ever!

Too bloody right. Its going to be like a cup final up here. The beers will be out. It will be interesting how many viewers it will get. Even the lefties won't be able to resist tuning in to have a wank :lol:
 


mona

The Glory Game
Jul 9, 2003
5,471
High up on the South Downs.
Sorry, I know we didn't see eye to eye with him on Falmer, but he talks so much sense on virtually every other issue he comments on. Ugly fucker, but great politician.

Bollox. His Falmer stance was symptomatic of his need to, on the one hand, play radical and state that he's a republican and, on the other, appeal to the wealthy middle Englanders who dominate Sussex by standing up to the football oiks. Like many politicos, he is a phoney and an opportunist.
 


Simster

"the man's an arse"
Jul 7, 2003
55,970
Surrey
Bollox. His Falmer stance was symptomatic of his need to, on the one hand, play radical and state that he's a republican and, on the other, appeal to the wealthy middle Englanders who dominate Sussex by standing up to the football oiks. Like many politicos, he is a phoney and an opportunist.
Alternatively, maybe he just didn't agree with you? :shrug:
 




ROSM

Well-known member
Dec 26, 2005
7,682
Just far enough away from LDC
The issue with Norman Baker is that he has made a career of being a bell weather. That is to say he sees where the wind is blowing and then positions himself downwind by enough of a distance to be seen as radical but not enough to be extreme.

His view on falmer is symptomatic on this in as much as he saw that defending the views of a proportion of his constituents was an extreme position against the popular opinion and he could gain sympathy, respect and kudos from doing so.

take his view on BBC expenses - he saw that the public opinion is against expenses and the bbc. he was offered travel to and from the bbc (at queens road brighton) for an interview and that they would pay UP TO the use of a car if that was the most convenient. He then took the train and claimed for it from the BBC but published that he could have taken a car.

Of course why he didn't

a) not claim at all as I have done on many occasions or
b) claim the train through the MP expenses as he was on official political business as an MP

seemed to have been missed in the resultant furore.

So, if you like what he says you need to understand whether you like the position he's adopted rather than what he truly believes
 




User removed 4

New member
May 9, 2008
13,331
Haywards Heath
The issue with Norman Baker is that he has made a career of being a bell weather. That is to say he sees where the wind is blowing and then positions himself downwind by enough of a distance to be seen as radical but not enough to be extreme.

His view on falmer is symptomatic on this in as much as he saw that defending the views of a proportion of his constituents was an extreme position against the popular opinion and he could gain sympathy, respect and kudos from doing so.

take his view on BBC expenses - he saw that the public opinion is against expenses and the bbc. he was offered travel to and from the bbc (at queens road brighton) for an interview and that they would pay UP TO the use of a car if that was the most convenient. He then took the train and claimed for it from the BBC but published that he could have taken a car.

Of course why he didn't

a) not claim at all as I have done on many occasions or
b) claim the train through the MP expenses as he was on official political business as an MP

seemed to have been missed in the resultant furore.

So, if you like what he says you need to understand whether you like the position he's adopted rather than what he truly believes
very good assessment.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here