Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Pompous Prat



Yorkie

Sussex born and bred
Jul 5, 2003
32,367
dahn sarf
From the BBC website

Defiant Meier stands firm


Referee Urs Meier has insisted he was right to rule out Sol Campbell's dramatic last minute effort in the Euro 2004 quarter-final against Portugal.
A defiant Meier also claimed that coach Sven-Goran Eriksson was looking to use him as a scapegoat for England's exit.

Meier said: "It was a clear foul, the keeper was in his own area and must be protected and if it happened again, I would make the same decision.

"England are looking for a scapegoat and they are looking to blame me."


A defiant Meier also insisted he interpreted the rules exactly right as laid down for the tournament.

He said: "England should remember that we are at Euro 2004 and not playing in the English Premier League.

"What is allowed there is not allowed here. There are different rules and I applied them."

The referee looked at both the spots and was happy with the conditions


Meier's decision, though, might have cost him his chance of refereeing the final.

Uefa's refereeing committee are certain to look at the incident in private and decide on Meier's fate.

Traditionally, the referee for the final is chosen from one of the four quarter-final officials.

Meier is one of Uefa's most respected officials but may be overlooked in favour of either Anders Frisk (Sweden), Russian Valentin Ivanov or Lubos Michel from Slovakia.

A Uefa official also said they were happy with the condition of the penalty spots after a pitch inspection carried out by Meier.

England coach Eriksson revealed after his side's penalty shoot-out exit that he had complained to Uefa before the match, following training sessions on the Estadio da Luz pitch.

David Beckham appeared to lose his footing as he blasted his penalty kick wide, and other players stamped down the turf before taking their kicks.


Meier insists he was right to disallow Campbell's header

But Uefa director William Gaillard said Meier had inspected both penalty spots and was happy for the shoot-out to go ahead.

Gaillard said: "Everyone saw that players were looking at the penalty spot before taking their kicks.

"It seems that one player had a particular problem with the penalty spot but none of the others and everyone can draw their own conclusions.

"The referee looked at both the spots and was happy with the conditions, and they flipped a coin to decide which end they would hold the shoot-out."
 




Cheeky Monkey

Well-known member
Jul 17, 2003
24,005
Get over it, water under the bridge. No amount of raised blood pressure or cyber debate will change the fact that England are out.
 


The Large One

Who's Next?
Jul 7, 2003
52,343
97.2FM
Yorkie said:

He said: "England should remember that we are at Euro 2004 and not playing in the English Premier League. What is allowed there is not allowed here. There are different rules and I applied them."

If there was a different set of rules governing European football matches than for English football matches, hadn't UEFA ought to have let us know first?

What he has actually said is that there is one set of rules for some, and another set of rules for others. And by saying that there are different rules, not only has he cost himself a place in the final, but also as a referee full stop.

The stupid prat. How do these people get elected as being TOP referees? Did he sleep with Lennard Johanssen?

I would also question the choice of referee because - as he is Swiss, it could be perceived that he may have had a bias. (It was England who knocked his country out.) A bit petty I know, but it's that sort of rule that applies for the group games. e.g. Mike Riley would not have refereed, say, Croatia v France.
 
Last edited:


Yorkie

Sussex born and bred
Jul 5, 2003
32,367
dahn sarf
That was my point TLO.

What different rules are there applying to fouling or not fouling keepers?
 


perth seagull

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
5,487
Yep, as far as I'm concerned it's ancient history now. No point getting worked up for weeks on end like a Swindon fan after the playoffs.
 




Wardy

NSC's Benefits Guru
Oct 9, 2003
11,219
In front of the PC
I think this might be a translation problem. I think what he meant was that the english game is more physical and most english refs would have allowed the goal. While the game on main land europe is a lot less physcial and if you even look the wrong way at the goalie in the area it is a foul.
 


The Large One

Who's Next?
Jul 7, 2003
52,343
97.2FM
But you should apply the same set of rules - and act in the spirit of the rules - worldwide.

There is no specific rule about a foul on the keeper in the area. If that was a defender and not the goalie, he almost certainly would not have blown for a foul. Which is a MASSIVE inconsistency.
 


ManxSeagull

NSC Creator
Jul 5, 2003
1,638
Isle of Man
The Sun are reporting his website overloaded after they printed the address.

We should hit it hard and exceed his bandwidth so it costs him financially.

:angry: :angry: :angry:
 




ManxSeagull

NSC Creator
Jul 5, 2003
1,638
Isle of Man
Yorkie said:
From the BBC website

A defiant Meier also insisted he interpreted the rules exactly right as laid down for the tournament.

He said: "England should remember that we are at Euro 2004 and not playing in the English Premier League.

"What is allowed there is not allowed here. There are different rules and I applied them."

Hang on... Do we not all play to the same set of rules?

What a £ucking vvanker !!
 
Last edited:


Icy Gull

Back on the rollercoaster
Jul 5, 2003
72,015
No suprise he's defiant, did any of you expect him to say " Ooops sorry guys I think I fecked England over their, won't happen again I promise"?
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here