NSC Player Ratings - Reading

[Turkey]

This season we'll have an NSC Player of the Season.

It's a rating out of 5.

5. Very Good
4. Good
3. Average
2. Poor
1. Very Poor
--------------

My Ratings.

Kuipers: 2
Virgo: 2
Cullip: 5
Butters: 4
Harding: 2
Currie: 3
Reid: 3
Oatway: 4
Nicolas: 4
Jarret: 4
Molango: 4

Hinshelwood: 3
Jones: 3
Robinson: 3

 

[Bobby's Gull]

Was Kuipers really that poor??

 

[Turkey]

Was Kuipers really that poor??

I wouldn't say that poor. He wasn't awful. However he conceeded 3 goals and I thought he could have done better at the time. Having seen the highlights I'm not so sure but I'll stick with my initial impression.

 

[Bobby's Gull]

Ok fair enough, I wasn't at the game and have had a few mixed reactions to how he played.

 

[Trigger]

Kuipers: 3
Virgo: 3
Cullip: 4
Butters: 3
Harding: 3
Currie: 3
Reid: 4
Oatway: 3
Nicolas: 4
Jarret: 4
Molango: 4

Hinshelwood: 3
Jones: 3
Robinson: 3

 

[saafend_seagull]

Kuipers: 3
Virgo: 2
Cullip: 4
Butters: 3
Harding: 2
Currie: 3
Reid: 4
Oatway: 3
Nicolas: 4
Jarret: 4
Molango: 4

Hinshelwood: 2
Jones: 3
Robinson: 3

 

[Wardy]

Kuipers 3
Virgo 3
Cullip 4
Butters 3
Harding 2
Currie 4
Reid 4
Oatwaty 4
Nicolas 4
Jarret 3
Molango 4

Hinshelwood 3
Jones 3
Robinson 4

 

[Yorkie]

Kuipers - 3

Virgo - 3
Cullip - 4
Butters - 3
Harding - 2

Jarrett - 4
Oatway - 3
Reid - 3
Currie - 2

Molango - 4

subs:
Robinson - 4
Jones - 3
Hinshelwood - 3


Ps It's a lot easier marking them out of 10

 

[the full harris]

Kuipers - 3

Virgo - 1
Cullip - 4
Butters - 4
Turkey - 1

Jarrett - 5
Oatway - 3
Reid - 3
Currie - 3

Molango - 4


Robinson - 4
Jones - 3
Hinshelwood - 3

 

[graz126]

did we only play with 10 men? where is the rating for nicolas? yorkie and full harris.

come on, must do better.

 

[Yorkie]

did we only play with 10 men? where is the rating for nicolas? yorkie and full harris.

come on, must do better.

oops that will teach me to copy and paste the names from someone else.
I shall edit forthwith.

 

[Yorkie]

Kuipers - 3

Virgo - 3
Cullip - 4
Butters - 3
Harding - 2

Jarrett - 4
Oatway - 3
Reid - 3
Currie - 2
Nicholas - 3

Molango - 4

subs:
Robinson - 4
Jones - 3
Hinshelwood - 3


Ps It's a lot easier marking them out of 10

 

[Knightsworld]

Kuipers - 3

Virgo - 1
Cullip - 4
Butters - 3
Harding- 2

Currie - 2
Nicolas - 3
Reid - 3
Oatway- 3
Jarrett - 3

Molango - 3

subs
Robinson - 3
Jones - 2
Hinshelwood - 3

 

[fatboy]

This is shit. It needs to be out of ten.

Kuipers 2.75
Virgo: 1.75
Cullip: 3
Butters: 2.75
Harding: 1.5
Currie: 2
Reid: 3
Oatway: 2
Nicolas: 4
Jarret: 3.5
Molango: 3

Hinshelwood: 2
Jones: 3
Robinson: 4

 

[oapdodge]

Kuipers: 3
Virgo: 2.5
Cullip: 3.75
Butters: 3.5
Harding: 2.5
Currie: 3
Reid: 3.75
Oatway: 3.5
Nicolas: 3.75
Jarret: 3.25
Molango: 4

Hinshelwood: 3
Jones: 2.5
Robinson: 3.75

Agree with others out of 10 makes it easier

 

[Turkey]

Well when I asked for comments last week about it no one seemed to concerned.

I like 5 rating because it's easy to define what each rating equals. If someone wants a scale for out a ten I guess it can be done buts its a little late now.

 

[Yorkie]

Well when I asked for comments last week about it no one seemed to concerned.

I like 5 rating because it's easy to define what each rating equals. If someone wants a scale for out a ten I guess it can be done buts its a little late now.

No it's not, just double up the scores already here.

I wanted to do a 2.5 or a 3.5 but didn't.

 

[Turkey]

No it's not, just double up the scores already here.

I wanted to do a 2.5 or a 3.5 but didn't.

I gave Cullip 5. I wouldn't give him 10.

 

[Albion Edd]

Kuipers: 3
Virgo: 2
Cullip: 4
Butters: 4
Harding: 2
Currie: 2
Reid: 3
Oatway: 3
Nicolas: 3
Jarret: 4
Molango: 3

Hinshelwood: 3
Jones: 2
Robinson: 4

 

[London Irish]

Kuipers: 2
Virgo: 2
Cullip: 4
Butters: 3
Harding: 3
Currie: 3
Reid: 3
Oatway: 4
Nicolas: 3
Jarrett: 4
Molango: 3

Hinshelwood: 3
Jones: 3
Robinson: 4

McGhee 5