Does that mean we can keep Beasant on?
Biscuit Native Creative Jul 8, 2003 22,387 Brighton Jul 18, 2003 #1 Does that mean we can keep Beasant on?
M Marc New member Jul 6, 2003 25,267 Jul 18, 2003 #2 I'd rather get Roberts or a young keeper, although Beasant would be good.
M Mullers Banned Jul 6, 2003 372 Good old Sussex by the sea! Jul 18, 2003 #3 Biscuit said: Does that mean we can keep Beasant on? Click to expand... No Ben Roberts!
Trigger Well-known member Jul 4, 2003 40,458 Brighton Jul 18, 2003 #4 I think 2 new strikers are equally as important as another goalkeeper seeing we dont have a recognised striker in the squad now... Luke Beckett, Luke Rodgers & Ben Roberts will do me just fine... Cant see it happening tho sadly.
I think 2 new strikers are equally as important as another goalkeeper seeing we dont have a recognised striker in the squad now... Luke Beckett, Luke Rodgers & Ben Roberts will do me just fine... Cant see it happening tho sadly.
M Mullers Banned Jul 6, 2003 372 Good old Sussex by the sea! Jul 18, 2003 #5 Trigger said: I think 2 new strikers are equally as important as another goalkeeper seeing we dont have a recognised striker in the squad now... Luke Beckett, Luke Rodgers & Ben Roberts will do me just fine... Cant see it happening tho sadly. Click to expand... But Trigger, it is not really "another goalkeeper", it's more of a case of a goalkeeper. Steve Coppell says he is not happy with FDM's kicking. There-again, are any of us?
Trigger said: I think 2 new strikers are equally as important as another goalkeeper seeing we dont have a recognised striker in the squad now... Luke Beckett, Luke Rodgers & Ben Roberts will do me just fine... Cant see it happening tho sadly. Click to expand... But Trigger, it is not really "another goalkeeper", it's more of a case of a goalkeeper. Steve Coppell says he is not happy with FDM's kicking. There-again, are any of us?