[Football] New Football Charter

[Bozza]

The Sun (yes, I know) are claiming to have seen a leak of a white paper detailing the new football charter which is a result of the Tracey Crouch report.

In brief...

- Tax on clubs to fund a regulator
- Ban clubs from joining unapproved leagues and competitions (ie European Super League)
- More rigorous tests on club owners, including the source of wealth
- Corporate governance code to ensure financial stability
- Minimum standard of fan engagement on key decisions involving club heritage

The paper suggests all clubs in the top five divisions will need to gain a fresh licence to operate by the regulator.

Full article for those interested and don't mind making the click:

Huge shake up to football ownership leaked - what it means for your club

DODGY owners will be blocked from getting hold of our footie teams under a huge clean-up. A leaked Government paper seen by The Sun will mean multi-millionaires who cannot prove the source of their…

www.thesun.co.uk

 

[Westdene Seagull]

In theory everything the FA should have being doing over the years but given their complete abdication of responsibilities I'm in support of the proposals. The only niggle in my mind is how independent of government will the regulator be ? We wouldn't want the ownership by the Saudis to go through on a nod and a wink as we don't wish to upset them because they buy our weapons and we need their oil.

 

[5Ways Gull]

What about prison sentences for players who try and cripple wunderkids

 

[Johnny RoastBeef]

The Sun (yes, I know) are claiming to have seen a leak of a white paper detailing the new football charter which is a result of the Tracey Crouch report.

In brief...

- Tax on clubs to fund a regulator
- Ban clubs from joining unapproved leagues and competitions (ie European Super League)
- More rigorous tests on club owners, including the source of wealth
- Corporate governance code to ensure financial stability
- Minimum standard of fan engagement on key decisions involving club heritage

The paper suggests all clubs in the top five divisions will need to gain a fresh licence to operate by the regulator.

Full article for those interested and don't mind making the click:

Huge shake up to football ownership leaked - what it means for your club

DODGY owners will be blocked from getting hold of our footie teams under a huge clean-up. A leaked Government paper seen by The Sun will mean multi-millionaires who cannot prove the source of their…

www.thesun.co.uk

Sorry can't bring myself to click.

Does that mean those clubs that have dubious ownership will fail to gain a license?

Will those clubs then be expelled until the owner relinquishes control?

 

[BBassic]

Sorry can't bring myself to click.

Does that mean those clubs that have dubious ownership will fail to gain a license?

Will those clubs then be expelled until the owner relinquishes control?

My thoughts exactly.

If this comes in and it still finds the Saudi state a "fit and proper" owner then the rest of it is basically bullshit as well.

 

[cjd]

the door

bolted

shutting

the horse has

after

 

[Paulie Gualtieri]

Starting from………….now

 

[Springal]

Sorry can't bring myself to click.

Does that mean those clubs that have dubious ownership will fail to gain a license?

Will those clubs then be expelled until the owner relinquishes control?

Let’s not get too hasty without knowing what that barrier is - especially given there was an Anthony Bloom named in the Panama papers once upon a time…

 

[Brian Fantana]

My thoughts exactly.

If this comes in and it still finds the Saudi state a "fit and proper" owner then the rest of it is basically bullshit as well.

My reading of it seems to be that the new 'fit and proper' test will only apply to future takeovers, which isn't hugely helpful. However, the practicalities of doing it retrospectively would be challenging to say the least.

 

[SAC]

There is no way that you could go back and look at all owners to see if they now are considered to be fit and proper, can you imagine the legal implications if (say) Man City and Newcastle owners were both found to be neither?

 

[Psychobilly freakout]

In theory everything the FA should have being doing over the years but given their complete abdication of responsibilities I'm in support of the proposals. The only niggle in my mind is how independent of government will the regulator be ? We wouldn't want the ownership by the Saudis to go through on a nod and a wink as we don't wish to upset them because they buy our weapons and we need their oil.

This, I can see exactly what you have eluded to happening reference government/outside intervention.
They are here now, what are the procedures to cleanse the sport of unworthy/unfit owners ?
The legal implications and costs would be astronomical, the undesired owners will not just walk away.
Totally unworkable.

The only owners that would be ousted or denied ownership will be low level crooks from this country, who wish to take over lower level teams and therefore it will only hurt in the long run, again the very clubs they want to help.

It is all bravado, with no as RDZ says "balls"

 

[ConfusedGloryHunter]

My thoughts exactly.

If this comes in and it still finds the Saudi state a "fit and proper" owner then the rest of it is basically bullshit as well.

I'm not convinced a government that finds the Saudi state "fit and proper" for the selling of arms to is going to get too righteous over letting them buy a few trophies too.

 

[Weststander]

the door

bolted

shutting

the horse has

after

Too late, Abram and ManC did exactly as they pleased, when UEFA tried to act, ManC could afford to engage the best law firms (plural) to win the appeal.

Emboldened by that Boehly and the Saudis are/will do exactly the same.

 

[Weststander]

I'm not convinced a government that finds the Saudi state "fit and proper" for the selling of arms to is going to get too righteous over letting them buy a few trophies too.

Do you think that Starmer’s government from Dec 2024 will not trade arms with these countries? Labour did exactly the same 1997 to 2010. This isn’t party political.

 

[Psychobilly freakout]

Do you think that Starmer’s government from Dec 2024 will not trade arms with these countries? Labour did exactly the same 1997 to 2010. This isn’t party political.

He did say "Government" & I am sure the poster is not that stupid to think "any" government has any sway over the arms or oil for that matter businesses.

 

[peterward]

The Sun (yes, I know) are claiming to have seen a leak of a white paper detailing the new football charter which is a result of the Tracey Crouch report.

In brief...

- Tax on clubs to fund a regulator
- Ban clubs from joining unapproved leagues and competitions (ie European Super League)
- More rigorous tests on club owners, including the source of wealth
- Corporate governance code to ensure financial stability
- Minimum standard of fan engagement on key decisions involving club heritage

The paper suggests all clubs in the top five divisions will need to gain a fresh licence to operate by the regulator.

Full article for those interested and don't mind making the click:

Huge shake up to football ownership leaked - what it means for your club

DODGY owners will be blocked from getting hold of our footie teams under a huge clean-up. A leaked Government paper seen by The Sun will mean multi-millionaires who cannot prove the source of their…

www.thesun.co.uk

All positive steps to protect the fans amd heritage from the excesses of greedy at all costs, interests.

 

[ConfusedGloryHunter]

He did say "Government" & I am sure the poster is not that stupid to think "any" government has any sway of the arms or oil for that matter businesses.

Yes, I am assuming we will carry on staying cosy with the Saudis regardless of political party in charge.

 

[Guinness Boy]

If it stops small clubs like Crystal Palace being owned by Iran I'm all for it.

 

[AmexRuislip]

In theory everything the FA should have being doing over the years but given their complete abdication of responsibilities I'm in support of the proposals. The only niggle in my mind is how independent of government will the regulator be ? We wouldn't want the ownership by the Saudis to go through on a nod and a wink as we don't wish to upset them because they buy our weapons and we need their oil.

I di think about this, who would be given the job of regularity body.
Someone with footy knowledge, footy finance knowledge, a brain, a dullard and a penchant for dwarf porn.
I wonder..........

 

[RandyWanger]

I think I want to go and work for the regulator. Could be fun.