Tommy Cook reporting
New member
Just a quick point about what Martin Perry said on yesterdays SCR Harty phone-in that has sort of confused me. Apologies if this has been talked about elsewhere, but I have a life (sometimes) and cannot spare the time to go through all the threads!
Talking about how the inquiry was coming down to a crunch between Falmer and Sheepcoate, Martin basically said that if Prescott feels there is another site (i.e Sheepcoate) then Falmer will be turned down. What that then means is that we can put a planning application in for Sheepcoate straightaway and it won't have to go back to his department if the Council approves it - even if there are serious objections. Thus we have a new ground, very quickly.
However, not minutes before Martin was saying that it would bring Brighton to a standstill having a stadium there. So if this scenario did occur (and it is a distinct possibility) how would the club solve the problem?
Any ideas?
Talking about how the inquiry was coming down to a crunch between Falmer and Sheepcoate, Martin basically said that if Prescott feels there is another site (i.e Sheepcoate) then Falmer will be turned down. What that then means is that we can put a planning application in for Sheepcoate straightaway and it won't have to go back to his department if the Council approves it - even if there are serious objections. Thus we have a new ground, very quickly.
However, not minutes before Martin was saying that it would bring Brighton to a standstill having a stadium there. So if this scenario did occur (and it is a distinct possibility) how would the club solve the problem?
Any ideas?