Kanchelskis 3 or 12 months ?

[WATFORD zero]

He does well and goes in 3 months - DK's fault for not offering a longer contract

He signs for 12 months, doesn't do well and it's DK's fault for doing a Kitson

So what would you offer 3 or 12?

 

[dwayne]

6 months

 

[Pavilionaire]

It's a gamble, but we must expect our other rivals to sign players in the coming months, strengthening their squads.

I say give him a 12-month contract as we will need his skills if we are to get promoted.

 

[Citrus]

Can always add anpther 9+ months on.

I say 3.

 

[elbowpatches]

Agree a contract for the rest of this season, then take it from there

 

[Rich Suvner]

If he's good enough, and I trust SC, then give him a 12 month contract

 

[Bob!]

12 months

If SC thinks he's good enough for 3, then he's good enough for 12 !!

 

[BrightonBird]

Lets stop this until if and when we sign him.

Hope we do as I could do with a new pair of skis.

 

[Shizuoka Dolphin]

3 - lets nota takea the riska! Mamma mia!

 

[Lush]

I want what Steve Coppell wants.

 

[Safeway]

Voted for 12 but I suspect it may be shorter.

 

[MRRF 10]

it should be a pay when you play contract

 

[Braders]

2 years - £50 quid a week

 

[AlbionFan]

12 months, but lets let SC decide. He knows best.