US Seagull
Well-known member
Draw your own conclusions

alan partridge said:cue looney...
REDLAND said:I can't see why they are related though ?
US gis us a clue ?
US Seagull said:I'll humour you since I'm not sure if you're taking the piss or not:
Dick Cheney was CEO of Halliburton and still receives cash from them in the form of deferred compensation and stocks. Dick Cheney is vice president of the United States of America and a chief supporter of the war in Iraq. Halliburton is a major contractor in Iraq grabbing $billions in "no bid" contracts from the government.
As I said, draw your own conclusions.....
The author is drawing a comparison between the two, to show how DC's cash is being made for him by the sacrifices of their brave boys. I.e. the profits are being bought through American blood.I know that I can't see why the amount of deaths affects there stock price ??
Duncan H said:The author is drawing a comparison between the two, to show how DC's cash is being made for him by the sacrifices of their brave boys. I.e. the profits are being bought through American blood.
In Britain, it would be more likely to see a cartoon showing Iraqi dead, not American, but the concept is the same.
Well, probably. However, you could argue that without the invasion of Iraq, the profits wouldn't have gone up so much, and so the money has been bought in this way.But its unrelated and there for RUBBISH !!
m20gull said:As usual, a good point made with poor statistics. If you cut the graph at the beginning of the conflict then the price is around $21 which is therefore only a 50% increase, not 150%. Also the cut-off of the graph with starting at $10 instead of zero again amplifies the increase when viewed proportionately.
Does anyone know if $30 is historically high for Halliburton? What was it before the market decline after 9/11, for instance?
And am I the only one encouraged by the obvious decline in the trend of US deaths over the last 6 months?
Safeway said:Great, more politics. JUST what NSC needs.![]()
Maybe Bozza should rename this site North Stand Politics. No, wait.....
m20gull said:As usual, a good point made with poor statistics. If you cut the graph at the beginning of the conflict then the price is around $21 which is therefore only a 50% increase, not 150%. Also the cut-off of the graph with starting at $10 instead of zero again amplifies the increase when viewed proportionately.
Does anyone know if $30 is historically high for Halliburton? What was it before the market decline after 9/11, for instance?
And am I the only one encouraged by the obvious decline in the trend of US deaths over the last 6 months?
SM BHAFC said:Glad to see that the same old crap is still being spouted on NSC it gladens my heart it never changes.
Here's to four more years of Geaore W Bush the best US president since Ronald Reagan